Antonio Margarito's size...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrMagic, Oct 2, 2008.


  1. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,435
    Sep 23, 2007
    The way he lost to Santos which BTW was about 10lbs bigger was complete hometown BS. The Williams fight was so close it could have been a draw. Margo was never hurt by Williams. He can be Champion at 154 in my opinion.
     
  2. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Williams clearly won the AM fight. Unanimous decisions aren't close fights.
     
  3. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,435
    Sep 23, 2007
    Do you watch boxing? A unanimous desicion means three judges have the same winner. Now these three judges can all the score of 115 to 114. Do you know what I am saying? probably not.
     
  4. pit

    pit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,159
    6
    Jul 25, 2004

    Iv alway stated that if margarito moved up in weight he would lose size and strength advantage ,, his style would not work at 154 and 160 ..
     
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Go google the meaning of unanimous. You thinking the fight could've been a draw is comical as well. Wiliams clearly won. Clearly. 3 judges unanimously picked Williams the winner.
     
  6. pit

    pit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,159
    6
    Jul 25, 2004

    Thomas hearns also had the skill and power to move up to Lt heavy something Im sure margarito can not do..

    so size was not the only thing Tommy relied on ..
     
  7. pit

    pit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,159
    6
    Jul 25, 2004

    For one Floyd does not rely on speed alone , 2 he's not fastest fighter out there and 3 pretty much everyone he has fought has been bigger then himself.

    Again Hearns had skill , speed and power which enable him move al the way to Lt heavy .. Margarito relies on size and strength alone I doubt he could do the same thing.
     
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    STFU Pit... leave your Mayweather defending out the door. It was an example...
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dude....if you can;t post on the topic.... please don't bother...
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Shane mosley beat DLh by SD in 200, and then by UD in the rematch. Which was closer in your eyes ... :patsch
     
  11. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Is this for real? :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Amen
     
  13. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,435
    Sep 23, 2007
    Your definition of unanimous decision needs work buddy. Unanimous can mean the three judges had one guy winning by a single point. Why is it comical that I think the fight could have been a draw. A lot of people had Margo winning.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Look for nallege's post in EVERY Margarito threads...and you'll have your answer.
     
  15. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,495
    2,435
    Sep 23, 2007
    No need. The guy is dumb as ****.