Antonio Tarver Interview

You know what i did, i spelled the word interpretation wrongly because im too lazy to think how its spelled, then i right click and it auto comes up and i paste that in, only i obviously did not read the word and anticipated it was the right word.

My bad.

 

I never told anyone off, just mentioned a disagrement with a mate in the pub where i thought i was right but was actually spectaculary wrong. I dont really give a ****, mildly embarrassed but still enjoyed the thread, only just picked up on it again.
And i wasnt throwing insults about.
Like i said too much smoke

 

It's all good. I was just ****in with ya.

 

interpenetration ftw.

 

:good

 

gotta love this thread haha. especially the way the ts starts so boldly and brazenly lmao

 

The majority of first rounds in boxing are even...they are a feeling out process, and in a lot of first rounds both boxers throw the same amount, and connect with the same amount of punches...is this not an even round?

Just because there isn't a clear winner in a round, and people find it hard to choose a winner...that doesn't make them "***** boys". Thats most likely why there are so many home town decisions...the judges see a close round and automatically give it to the hometown boxer. When in fact, if it was a clear "even" round...a 10-10 round would be a lot less unbiased.

 

That comment was just his last stand once he had finally lost his argument competely.

 

Nice one i forgot about this thread lets go for 10k posts!!

 

His argument is...he was kinda wrong, but he was kinda right aswell...using insults to back up his argument that he was right. When in fact, he was just completely wrong.

 

Just shows the level of some 'boxing fan's' on esb!

 

What if each fighters scored KDs in the round, do both get an 8-8?

 

The one who was more active and accurate would get the 10-9 :nut

 

Didnt realise you still posted here after that debacle