You know, we're not official judges so if we see a round and can't name a winner of the round, it's fair to say it's a 10-10 round, as that is how YOU saw it. Douchebag.:hi:
You ****ing dumbass, you don't even know what it means. I'm sure by now you've gotten your ass handed to you in this thread but I'll jump in. 10 must system means the winner of the round will be awarded 10 points, if a point is deducted there is a seperate column on the score card. Even rounds are allowed and always have been.
It is a ten point must system, 10-10 score is allowed. You seem to be retarted, there ain't an argument in the world not to score an even round. If you can't determine a winner for a round because it has been so damned close why give it to someone.
I agree. Now, some people think that if you can't determine a winner of a round, you are not a good judge. I disagree with that.
The scary part is that guys like the TS get drunk, smoke weed, watch a fight on some shitty internet stream, and then come back here and try to convince us their score cards are accurate.atsch
****ing moron. The '10-point must system' means at least one fighter has to get 10 points each round. If it's an even round, it's 10-10. Twat.
The guy started a thread calling us all idiots when he clearly had no idea what he was talking about. :rofl:rofl He deserves 20-30 pages of this.
Says who? An idiot like you? If the round is even then what is the harm i nscoring it even? It would do more injustice if fighter A clearly won 5 rounds while the rest of the other 7 rounds nobody domainted but was awarded to fighter B becuase the judges were forced to pick one of them.