Antonio Tarver or Glen Johnson, the greater fighter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bxrfan, May 2, 2008.


  1. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    I'd say they are equal.
    1. They both beat RJJ, Woods, Griffin (although Tarver beat a better version). 2. They are 1-1 head to head.
    3. They both lost to Hopkins.

    A case can be made Johnson is better because he arguably beat Dawson, while Tarver can make a case because he beat a better RJJ/Griffin. I know Tarver has less losses, but some of Johnsons are very questionable. All things considered, I'd say they are equal.
     
  2. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Agreed, I even give Johnson a slight edge
     
  3. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Tarver beat Jones twice, and probably a more focused Jones on both occasions. But I consider Glen the more complete fighter, and you have to respect his willingness to take on challenges overseas. Complete tossup, good question though.
     
  4. VIP

    VIP Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,175
    2
    Aug 19, 2004
    Tarver is the better fighter. Resume is similar though.
     
  5. 11player

    11player Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,174
    387
    Sep 19, 2007
    People and history will remember Tarver a lot more than Glen, but I think Glen is better.

    I feel bad for Glen'd bad luck, he should have had better.

    Yet, he is still a hell of a fighter and can surelly get a belt or two.

    He should just stay away from the big names for a while, that's where he's getting his bad luck.

    With Green vacating the WBA belt, he may be able to get into a fight for that belt or at least for the mandatory position. Then there is Erdei, the WBO champion, who Glen can surelly beat. I think he should take one of these routes.
     
  6. Darien

    Darien Active Member Full Member

    820
    0
    Dec 28, 2004
    Tarver's resume is slightly better but Glen fought most of his fights in his opponents' backyard and suffered some controverisal losses. Their management is the real difference. I like the road warrior much better TBH. He's a real old-school fighter who's willing to take on everyone everywhere even on short notice and he always respects his opponents. A true gentleman and a helluva fighter.
     
  7. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  8. Spitfire7

    Spitfire7 Gadfly Full Member

    4,498
    2
    May 18, 2007
    Glencoffe, for sheer hardwork and class in and out of the ring...:good
     
  9. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    i think tarver has proved more myself, i voted tarver
     
  10. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Tarver is the better fighter tlent wise. Johnson is overral a loveable loser, who troubles alot of good fightrs but has legitamtely lost to many of them. Solid world ranked contender, nothing more, nothing less. Tarver has that bit more class about him - though he is no HOFer himself!
     
  11. Dunks

    Dunks Absolute Grandmaster Full Member

    7,771
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    the word GREAT and fighter cant be put into the same sentence with these guys names....who is better? who cares