Any reason a champ with 23 title defenses, 9 yr reign not be considered an ATG?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MMJoe, May 19, 2013.


  1. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    When you are the champion for 6 almost 7 years you will have to defend against some guys who aren't level.

    Edwin Viruet was a solid, championship level fighter, DeJesus ain't getting put away quick by anyone if a prime Duran could not do it. He was that tough and that great. He would have been the unified champion forever if not for Duran. Ernesto Marcel was a solid featherweight and retired a champion. Duran fought and beat by TKO in only his 17th pro fight. Don't forget about Ken Buchanan who Duran beat the tar out of.

    On top of that in almost 7 years only 10 men went the distance with him out 72 fights. What was he, like 71-1-61 KO's. That is almost Robinson like numbers.


    Monzon.

    Two wins great, great over Bennie Briscoe, Two Kayo's over Nino Benvenuti, two over Griffith one KO, Napoles quit, and two solid wins over Valdez who was a lion in those fights. Didn't lose a fight from '64 to '77 winning something like 60 in a row. Ruled the World middleweight division for 7 years KO'ing almost all comers. That is the epitome of a champion. Where the heck are those guys today?
     
  2. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    he should go in the HOF for his accomplishments and he has some decent names (hall, hill, griffin) on his record. really, he would be spoken of MUCH higher and his legacy re-evaluate if he fought and beat jones. but since he didn't, he will always always be defined as "the other guy" at 175
     
  3. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    Because he isn't Known by the American public who have a full monopoly on ATG rankings in general.
     
  4. WABCBoxer

    WABCBoxer Member Full Member

    482
    2
    May 7, 2013
    He was a good fighter, but he never fought RJJ in the 90's. Also, it would've looked better too if he'd not lost his last 2 fights. Based purely on pro record alone, 48-0 with 38 KOs would've made for a decent argument and at least left reasonable question marks.
     
  5. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009

    Are they good, yes. Is Michalczewski good, yes.
    Not clear on the point you are making and why you quoted me.
     
  6. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    He did unify, the organizations screwed him though.


    The was explained by Zoo in a previous post...

     
  7. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,572
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    Tell me I didn't just read about Dariusz' reign being compared to Monzon's?
     
  8. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    He's probably looking at Rocky Marcinao's record and got beat on number 49
    (Same as Holmes). Jones would have looked better had he quit after Ruiz of Tarver 1. People in the future who have never seen Jones fight will look at his record and wonder what all the commotion was about.
     
  9. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    If Roy is nr1, it's ok to be nr2.
     
  10. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Dariusz reign - longer, more defenses and higher KO percentage.
    That aside, why does Dariusz have to be considered greater than Monzon, Ali, and Duran to have ATG consideration?
    None of those greats have to fit that criteria to be considered great.
    Why does he have to have beaten RJJ for that consideration when Hopkins and Toney aren't held to that standard?

    Why is Michalczewski given more hoops to jump through then all these other fighters? Doesn't make sense.
    It seems there is an extra effort put forward to block Michalczewski of any credit for anything. Just because the media never got behind him doesn't me you don't have to. You do not have to think as you are told to think, you care allowed to have your own thoughts, you know that right?
     
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,927
    17,987
    Apr 3, 2012
    Rocky might've been better than all three of those guys, without any doubt Hall.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    he did but that doesn't have to be the be all and end all. Naz and Martinez got railroaded but maintained their place at the top of the division because noone else ever did better than they did.

    In the case of DM he chose the wbo over the wba which was a stupid move. He also made no attempt to face guthries for the ibf belt. He was content returning to obscurity whilst Jones cleaned house.

    It isn't entirely DM's fault, it's a nature of the times. In the past he'd have been the one true champ and the onus would have been on Jones to face him. But as it was the converse became true.

    It was one of the reasons linearity and it's prestige died.
     
  13. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    DM had a 12 year, 48 unbeaten streak w/38 KO's.
    Compare that to ATG's Basillio, LaMotta, Frazer, Arguello, Napoles, Dick Tiger, Micky Walker, Maxim, Conn, Foster, Spinks, Torres....
     
  14. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    He got little, (possibly no) media coverage in the west and in historic terms it really cost him.
     
  15. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Didn't defend against the best names in the division until later, and still dodged the best guy in the division.

    Guys like him and Calzaghe run into that problem; Long reigns, not many good fighters. Calzaghe pulled his 168 lb legacy together at the very end by all but cleaning the division out. Dariusz never quite decided to do that, and then ended his career with an absolute whimper.