Anybody have cunningham winning the fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by freddy-wak, Dec 12, 2008.


  1. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    i just gave the close rounds to steve...i mean, i even had him winning 2 of the rounds where he got dropped....
    adamek is a ****en beast though, definately a guy you can't root against....

    it seemed as though steve was controlling everything, his downfall was trying to bang with adamek, but you can't blame him for wanting to impress the crowd.....
     
  2. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    i had cunningham up by 115-113
     
  3. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    How did you guys score the 4th round since it seemed Steve was gonna win it 10-8 without the kd but then Adamek kd Cunningham?
     
  4. JAHamilton77

    JAHamilton77 Walking Violence Full Member

    373
    0
    Jan 23, 2007
    Had Cunningham losing by 1
    would have been a draw except I think I had the 11th even.
     
  5. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    COME ON MAN, adamek didnt dominate that fight.....:lol:
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    how do you get three 10-8 rounds and people have cunningham winning? maybe uf he swept the 9 other rounds but he didnt....
     
  7. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004
    cause he was losing 2 of those rounds when the kd's happened...
     
  8. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Dude, people that don't score the fight or don't pay close enough attention are easily fooled by knockdowns and the crowd.

    Just like in the Dawson - Johnson fight where Chad won 7 rounds easy, people still think Johnson "beat the **** outta Chad". It makes no sense.
     
  9. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    rule of thumb they always give you a 10-8 when you get dropped....unless you dominate the round and ket knocked down with a second left....
     
  10. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    Which happened in at least one of the KD rounds (4?). Arguments could be made that there were 2 9-9 rounds in that fight.
     
  11. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004

    exactly....
     
  12. thatoldhate

    thatoldhate Member Full Member

    178
    0
    Dec 12, 2008
    guys can we be serious for just 1 sec here? I mean seriously just 1 god damned second!

    no way did cunningham win that fight lol. adamek did wat he had to do and busted steves face in lol.
     
  13. Rui

    Rui Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,755
    2
    Apr 3, 2008
    You mean a 10-9 round. With the 10 point must system, there can never be any 9-9 rounds unless points are deducted.
     
  14. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    In fact, if USS was dominating the round, to th point where a 10-8 is necessary (I was watching a shitty stream so it was hard for me to score), the argument can go that a rare 9-8 round is in order, as the knockdown only takes a point from the fighter knocked down, doesn't automatically give the fighter who knocked the other down a point. It depends on the person scorin the fight. I'd love to see a rematch.
     
  15. unclepaulie

    unclepaulie Run like an antelope! Full Member

    6,002
    1
    Aug 14, 2007
    No, I mean a 9-9 round. If a fighter is dominating a round and gets knocked down, it can be scored a 9-9 round, as the point taken would be the 10th point.