Anybody have cunningham winning the fight

why do you feel offended by that?

its a fact, Adamek gets hit flush a lot but his chin is undentable and is completely 1 dimensional

if anyone should be offended its Margo fans

 

Adamek has a beautiful jab, and is a boxer-puncher. Not a volume puncher. Totally different style of fighter.

He was outboxing Cunningham in many rounds, throwing a mere 40 punches per round.

You continue to show your limited, ******* boxing knowledge.

 

please u dumb ****, ur ass was on boxrec lobbying Adamek as top 10 p4p

Cunningham was the one outboxing Adamek, and all 3 rounds when Cunningham was KD he was dominating or clearly winning.

And me being a pac fan has more credibility than ur dumbass nominating some lousy **** Polska fighter as the next best thing

 

adamek was the mandatory challenger. No Re-Match clause.

 

Round-wise it was a fairly close fight. I think most people can agree on that. The knockdowns are what did it for Adamek. There were also a couple times in which Cunningham had seemed to do enough to nick the round but Adamek would come on strong at the end to make it debatable. I really don't see any argument for Cunningham winning. He would have had to win at least 8 rounds to counter the knockdowns and it's pretty safe to say that he did not. Adamek won at least 5 rounds, which makes it a points victory for him any way you cut it.

Frankly, I'm surprised that Cunningham didn't commit to throwing more straight rights. Had he studied the Briggs fights he would have seen that Adamek really has no answer for the straight right other than to walk through it as his chin is rock solid.

 

the kd's destroyed Cunningham....and Adamek has a sneaky right hand when he wants and Cunningham couldn't get out of the way of it....

 

One of the rounds which SC won was the 4th that could have been even a 10-8 in his favour and because of the KD he lost it 10-8 or 10-9.

 

Behind the scenes post fight footage of Cunningham and also fight analyst.

[YT]K9BbsLOcvv4[/YT]

 

just saw it and i didn't bother keeping track but it was a close call, a winnable fight for either fighter....i'd love to see a rematch

i've only seen Adamek fight twice and this was my 1st Cunningham fight i've seen.....well i dont wanna go into details, it's been said but yeah i wanna see a rematch in 09'

BTW i think David Haye's son Enzo would beat both of these 2, i'd like to see either of them in the ring with him

 

1) You exposed yourself as a useless tool with zero boxing knowledge by saying Adamek and Margarito are the same kind of fighter.

2) Show me where I claimed Adamek is in the top 10 P4P? Oh that's right, you can't! Dip****.

3) Owned, son.

 

Still no answers?

That's what I thought. :rofl

 

Well I was wrong about Adamek! I thought Cunningham would be just way too much for him, as I felt that Cunningham was highly underrated.

 

No way Jose, especially with 3 KD's.

 

I agree! I wonder what Dr. Clark Sammartino is a doctor of...optometry? A 114-112 card for Cunningham means that without the three knockdowns, Cunningham won 9 out of the 12 rounds...Please! What was this guy smoking and what fight was this guy watching? I have a sneaking feeling that if the American fighter was the one who scored three knockdowns there is no way this fight could possibly have been a split decision!

 

I have just re-watched the fight as i never score a fight when i watch it live.
I have 113-112 Adamek, and i scored the 4th round 10-8 Adamek.

The 4th round was tough to score, Dont know how everyone else had it?

The 3 knockdown's won the fight for Adamek because without them i would of had Cunningham winning fairly comfortably.