Lampley comments that he wants to sort something out because he messed it up in the Cotto/Pacquiao fight - which he did - by saying that after Martinez was knocked down and comes back at Williams, that he is fighting to make it a 10-9 round. Not a 9-9 round as he said in Cotto/Pac, because there is no such thing as a 9-9 round, but rather a 10-9 round if Martinez wins the round but was knocked down. All good there. Then, Kellerman that ass clown says NAH HE WAS TRYING TO MAKE IT A 9-9 ROUND. Does this guy even listen to what the hell is going on?
there is a 9-9 round though if he wins the round and the person winning the round gets a point taken off because of an illegal blow it becomes 9-9 doesnt it?
Only if the winner of the round gets a point deducted or gets knocked down. Otherwise its a 10 point must from my understanding.
How about 'Zab Judah is like a more powerful version of Pernell Whitaker' or 'Roy Jones Jr could beat Joe Frazier'. They always crack me up.
This content is protected For example: Martinez won that 1st round against Williams in my eyes because his knockdown did more damage so I scored it 10-Martinez, 9-Williams.
theres no such thing as a 9-9 round all even rounds get scored 10-10 regardless of wat happened to make it even
I think that is wrong Brickfists mate! I consider "10 point must" to mean that there has to be a winner of the round.
I scored it 10-9 for Martinez ... seeing that he landed the bigger shots and that he actually hurt Williams bad.. but the judges didn't see it that way.. they all gave it to Williams 10-9
9-9 in the case of a point deduction only. Still 10 point must if there's a knockdown. Each guy gets knocked down, then a judge should still score it 10-9 for the guy they think won the round. Considering Martinez actually hurt Williams with his knockdown, and Martinez was knocked down flash, I think that was a pretty darn clear 10-9 round for Martinez.