Anyone eles thought the Ortiz vs Peterson decision was straight BULL****?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by darryl1914, Dec 12, 2010.


  1. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,243
    2
    Jun 14, 2009
    96-92 for Ortiz on my card. I still can't/don't or won't understand how one judge or anyone for that matter scored the fight in favor of Peterson. I thought Lamont came on strong later in the fight, but there was no way he won the fight by the margin on that judges scorecard...STRAIGHT BULL****!!!

    So with Judah's recent gift, a draw for Peterson and Ortiz, Khan's victory, Maidana is still a viable opponent, Matthysse proving he belongs, Rios talking about moving to 140 2011, Bradley/Alexander winner (even the loser is still a contender) Kotelnik and more...140 IS LOOKING LIKE A MONSTER FOR 2011!!!!
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,133
    10,552
    Jul 28, 2009
    Neither were fighting to their best, as I've seen them fight. But it was a crap fight with a godawful decision and I wrote the WBA for the first time since the only other time (Valuev/Holyfield).
     
  3. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    I agree, I felt ortiz ran like a coward but he still deserved the victory!

    2011 should be good, the 140 pound division is stacked!!!
     
  4. hamiltonporter

    hamiltonporter Member Full Member

    410
    56
    Jul 23, 2010
    No. In fact I could believe how hard Peterson was dominating Ortiz at some points. Just because Ortiz got 2 kd's in round 3 doesn't mean he would win the fight. He was embarrassed at some points by Peterson. If it wasn't for the De la Hoya judges and refs he would have probably lost. He did not look impressive.
     
  5. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    :lol: :patsch