i think it was lampley or kellerman on a late night panel with manny and bradley, and he said "manny, you have not fought a good fighter in his peak in a loooonnng time" and manny agreed!
expect this thread to be ignored. anytime you make a good point that can't be denied. nobody shows up
pac is transparent. you can see it in his face. it was evident in his face when he lost to jmm 3 times everytime the decision was announced. he knows he lost. you can see it if he doesn't want to fight someone and if he is guilty about something.
I'm inclined to agree that he did agree that it was true, however, you should also take into consideration that: 1. It's common culture here to agree to everything a host says for as long as it ain't overly negative (pathetic I know, but blame it on the Spaniards for inculcating that into our culture), and; 2. There's a slim chance that he didn't really fully understood the question. Dude's poor at English. That being said, I think he fully understood and agreed to what was said, and I guess that says a lot about who is in control of his choice of opponents.
That was just a Pac gut reaction. - Kind of like a pigeon pecking on a lever after hearing a bell, to get a treat. The boy isn't really able to think on his feet. He's, oh what's that phrase ... oh yeah: Dumb as a post.
I think too many people are obsessed with a fighter's "prime". What's important is that you're fighting good fighters. That's what Manny has been doing. Although he's been blowing guys out, it's not like he's been fighting soft touches. He's been fighting good comp. Many of these fighters aren't getting the credit they deserve for their level of opposition.
