Anyone else rank Ezzard Charles top 5 p4p of all time?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 5, 2010.


  1. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    I wish I knew more about the unfoldings of those fights. They are certainly very intriguing wins at that stage of a fighter's development. Maybe size was a key issue?

    I'd rate Robinson, Armstrong, Greb, Fitz, and Langford above him for starters, though. Duran, maybe Leonard, maybe Gans, maybe Pep, maybe Ali, McFarland, Dixon, etc.

    I'd probably have him around #7 though, were I to actually make a list. I dunno what it is about Charles. His achievement is the stuff of the boxing Gods, but as a stylist he was just never terribly impressive to me on film, and I've seen a lot of him. A bit like Griffith, albeit of a higher class. Not to say he's necessarily overrated (obviously his resume shows differently), but I just don't really think as highly of him on film as many others. Undeniably very effective, though.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,831
    51,923
    Mar 21, 2007
    Charles-Burley I wasn't a shock. Burley was only the slightest of favourites for it. Charles was already considered to be a top-class operator at 19. With the LHW division arguably locked down, a pair of cracking wins at MW and a very respectable run up at HW that is usually enough to see him land a top 20 birth, I think #7 is OK, but any lower is pushing things. I don't think Dixon should be above him. I understand the Griffith comparison, but I don't like the Griffith comparison. Charles is a much, much more dangerous puncher and capable of much more natural aggression. Griffith could never have produced a fight like Marshall.

    The second time, i'm guessing that Charles kept Burley on the backfoot with sheer aggression whilst Burley tried to box more. Hard to tell from the snippets i've seen. I oddly know way more about the Marshall fight.
     
  3. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    81
    Apr 4, 2010
    The rematch with Ortega, as well as the third Paret fight might qualify. I get your point, though. No doubt about it Charles was the bigger puncher. Just not much more exciting.

    What!?
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,831
    51,923
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:


    No.
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    top 5 material for me defo
     
  6. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    1 Greb
    2 Robinson
    3 Langford
    4 Armstrong
    5 Charles
    6 Duran
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,217
    53,688
    Feb 11, 2005
    Great list!

    (because it is almost exactly the same as mine)
     
  8. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    Duran at 4 is absolute bull****. He should never be above Muhammad Ali in any case.
     
  9. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,641
    735
    May 22, 2007
    I have him at number 5.

    1.SRR
    2. Armstrong
    3. Langford
    4. Greb
    5. Charles
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    At the time was he not just over the Middleweight limit, he was definitly a Middleweight though, albeit a big one and Burley had mixed with fighters at top level who were big Middleweights.

    I think the first win is very emphatic for Charles and for me it seems to have been a mix of Charles; speed, power, and aggresion that won him the fight.

    I disagree, I think he is very impressive on film. A sound boxer-puncher who was a good athlete, I always think of him as a less athletic although more fundamentally sound Ray Robinson. He also looked very accurate and had a great offence.

    Not the nature of it though? How dominant Charles was against such a great operater?

    I always think Charles is abit overlooked by more casual fans due to him being Heavyweight champion, and admittadly not the greatest champion or one who captured the imagination of fans. So they tend to overlook his cracking resume sub-175lbs.

    I think it was more in terms of his achievements compared to his ability on film, that El Buija was using for an example, rather than any stylistic comparisons, although I maybe wrong.

    What Marshall fight?
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,831
    51,923
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sure, I just meant that the odds were rather short - Burley was only a slim favourite going in.


    Marshall-Burley.
     
  12. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    Thats fair enough, but the dominance is very surprising IMO.

    Thanks just clarifying not sure if you meant Charles vs Marshall.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,831
    51,923
    Mar 21, 2007
    And the second one too. It sounds like Burley flat out didn't get into that one.

    Beating a guy like Burley at 19 is crazy. In one newspaper he's actually described as "nineteen year old schoolboy Ezzard Charles" :lol: Bet old Charley loved that one.
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    :lol::lol:
     
  15. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,443
    1,203
    Jul 19, 2004
    5 is a perfect spot since that is where he is on my list!