Anyone else think that going down to 1 title per weight class would make boxing worse

I don't have a problem with the WBC, WBA, and WBO being involved for 3 titles. But what bothers me is that they each have their own titles, turning 3 belts into 12. Add in the IBF and all the belts these sanctioning bodies make up and it gets ridiculous. 3 belts, 1 sanctioning body. 1 super champ, 1 regular, 1 interim. That'd be fine with me. The Super champ would be required to face the current Regular or Interim champs only. The Regular champ would be required to face the Interim only. And the Interim champ would basically be a place holder to keep the champs busy. Something like that.

 

i could care less about the multiple belts as a could about the million divisions we have.....there should be 5 divisions...thats it...would make for better competition, better fights, and more big name fights to try and get those titles because with less divisions there is less titles

120-140, 140-160, 160-180, 180-200, and 200+

 

yeah, watch out for that "finicial muscle"
but on a serious note, and looking through your (usual) anti-American comments, having one belt per division would also imply that there would be one federation to govern
if that federation had no financial investment in matchups, or the result of them, then small-minded bigotry would be a thing of the past when it came to who fought who and when, as well as views of like-minded individuals :good