Anyone give the Huckster a chance against Povetkin?

Bryn

 

Nobhead

 

A load more than in the previous 30 years! Spinks, Moorer and Holyfield were legit champs. Haye, Jones and Toney won titles whilst having mainstream boxing attention.

And to get totally technical, as a human baby has yet to be born weighing 200lbs+, it can be argued every heavyweight steps up to the division at one stage in their career.

 

:twisted: Supports your theory?

 

I could only remember Spinks, Holy, Haye & Jones. :good

The point I was trying to make was that Huck is nowhere near as good as any of those guys, I dont think he has much of a chance in this fight.

 

Why do you think Povetkin is ****?


Unbeaten, gold medal at the Olympics.

Guy hasnt lost in pro or amateur in over a decade.

 

Hmmmm thinking about..Huck could well win a controversial SD....rematch then....profits all around for Kalle...bit like what Don King use to do.

 

Joe Louis had the same physical dimensions...as Pov il give you that...as Alex has alot of blubber to make that extra 20 pounds on him...they both have the same muscle mass.

Louis of course was better all around than Pov except chin....he would knock Huck out in 4.

 

Why a SD? Can't Kalle afford the 3rd judge just to make sure?

 

:think What theory would that be, Fleaston?

 

Competitive early but eventually Povetkin to pick holes in Huck's wild onslaughts and win late on via stoppage.

 

So its even in that they're both ****? quality

 

I'm not even certain that Chambers or Chagaev hit as hard as Galento or Braddock, let alone Buddy, Schmeling, Wacott or Marciano. Povetkins chin is nowhere near as proven as Louis', nor his recuperative powers.

And 'Pab, I dunno, I never got it out of you in the end.

 

Ha possibly, Im thinking Pov in reality wins it 8 - 4 or around that...alot of the rounds...slow and not much happening...so cant give him a clear UD now can we lol