Anyone here actually thinks (beside Brits) that Hatton can beat Paulie or Bradley?

you are also one of the biggest hatton trolls i have seen on this board.

Hatton would take both. I am not a huge fan of either fighter, but it is very clear to see that if hatton were to fight paulie, i truely dont see paulie working well with hattons constant pressure

 

OH yea I'm a Hatton troll because I speak the truth about him. LOL@ Hattons constant pressure.. Sure buddy.. He couldnt even put away a slow plodding 135 lber. I can't wait for this fight to happen. Look for Hatton to change his plans and not fight Malignaggi.

 

Hatton vs Malignaggi with a undercard of Witter vs Bradley. Hatton's got the finacial clout to get this done. It produces endless possibilites.

 

OK plain and simple, Hatton has nothing to fear of Paulie's right hand:nono If anything? It breaks again by round 5.

I picked PM to beat Cotto:nut Because I respected his game and inaccurately belived Cotto was OVER RATED. This fight marked Cotto's rise because ge proved Paulie can be caught and 1 hand just wont get it done.

Now I watched in AGONY as MC made a fool of me. Yet walked away with pride because the kid showed the kinda guts and heart Champions have. Despite having his face broke in multiple places, he let his will fight on. Yet the lack of a real 2 handed attack is always gonna hurt.

Hatton will be on him like white on rice and coming in and out of the clinches with combo's and better offense than N'dou.

Even if Paulie sports the Baldie, a beard, and wears a hat that says WAR? Hattons going to beat him clearly, I wonder after seeing him stunned multiple times by N'dou, how much that Cotto beating took from him. I respect the guy though I dont care for his flash and showmanship.

 

For all his handspeed, Malignaggi seems to have no ring intelligence. He gets hit way to much. I don't think he can beat Hatton, but he can make him look bad in spots. If he had ring discipline (intelligence), he would school Hatton.

 

yeah because mallignaggi has looked amaziong in his last couple of fights hasn't he.

hatton will beat them both. bradley is nothing amazing, but looked good because witter was barely throwing anything. that wouldn't be the case with hatton.

and "He couldnt even put away a slow plodding 135 lber" lazcano's got an excellent chin and has only been tko'd once and is also 2.5" taller with a 7" bigger reach who could fight at WW, but hatton did wobble him loads of times without ko'ing him.

 

Hatton beats both with ease. Like roly said Bradley is nothing wow, he is like a USA version of Gavin Rees in that he got lucky on the night.

Hatton also takes Malignaggi apart with ease if saturdays fight is anything to go by.

It s a shame Hatton is going after these belt holders rather than fighting the big guns like Cotto.

These fights mean nothing and is like a 9.9 second 100metre sprint champ running against 12 year old school kids.

 

He beats them both

 

Because if someone as **** as Mayweather can beat Hatton, ANYONE can! :rofl

 

He beats both, though I think Bradley may offer the bigger test.

 

Agreed. :good

 

One thing about Bradley - he's the same size as Hatton.

When was the last time Hatton actually fought someone the same size as him :huh

Answer (according to Boxrec) - John Bailey - is the first who's the same or smaller at 5'5 in 2001!

...gave up after that

 

well I dont think that will make any difference, his worst rounds were the first 6 before the 'apparent' breakage.

 

5ft 9, 72" reach Lazcano?

It was only a few days ago, you have a bad memory.

 

Hatton's 5'6 :huh