I caught that. That **** was cool. Homeboy put a lot of power in 90% of his shots which is why he spun when he missed lol. He doesn't mind looking like a amatuer to get the job done.
the man is not an athlete. At a higher weight he could not fight like that. His so called iron chin would be exposed.
Crude but effective! It would of been good night if the lunging upper cut hit and the 360 hook.. Bang....
:deal Any old Tom, Dick and Harry can fight nothing but World Class opponents for 5 years and only suffer two losses. The man's a lazy slob without an athletic bone in his body So you're saying if he started to fight at a higher weight he might get hurt by bigger, harder punchers? What!?!?! Noooooo way! :nut
Sarcasm - Brilliant. Boxing is a declining sport. The world class operator he faced schooled him. His athleticism is poor. I have seen some of his training and he looked **** poor on the rope, slow as fk on the bike and his running technique was a joke. Sorry but no sale. The guy will lose to ward again badly and the only one rocked on Saturday was him! If you know any athletic statistics for him then please share. He does not seem athletic to me or capable of great movement or balance. More sarcasm - cant be arsed to dignify PS I was cheering him on during the fight but any realist knows ward is better - see Lennox Lewis's comments
You're sat on a forum claiming that a world class fighter who in 5 years of fighting the toughest series of opposition of any fighter in the entire sport and only suffering 2 losses along the way (one close and the other to a true elite boxer) is unathletic, based on footage you've seen of him training. Other than sarcasm, what kind of reaction was you expecting?
Evidence based persuasion Show me a vid of his "athleticism" - i see a guy throwing punches that would be embarrassing in a bar room brawl Convince me of your beliefs Sarcasm is just pathetic
atsch You know you're dealing with a special kind of ****** when they're challenging you to provide evidence that a world class fighter is athletic.
You know you cant back up your beliefs when all you can do is deflect and crudely label. Go on you tube and compare floyd vs froch jumping rope. Even 55 year old SRL NOW is more impressive on the rope than two left feet froch
:rofl:rofl Can't back up my beliefs? My beliefs are that you don't beat Pascal, Taylor, Kessler, Abraham, Bute, Johnson, Dirrell or any other world class fighter for that matter without being athletic. Your beliefs are that he's not athletic because you've seen some videos of him training. Well done. "He's not athletic . . . . . go compare footage of him skipping to the 20lbs lighter future ATG boxer and one of the best athletes of his generation" atsch
It took me 10 seconds to find examples of HW's skipping with far more balance and agility than froch - you are just blinkering yourself against the evidence. Froch wins because of cardio and his chin not athleticism. On a talent level i dont recall the best guys ever being so crude. I've seen viali punch himself off his own feet but I cant recall anyone else doing it.