Anyone think The 1940's Heavies Were On A Par With The 1970's?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Apr 15, 2015.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,173
    25,416
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed.. One of my idols ( Apollo Creed ) might never have existed.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    It is what it is. Darmani Rock could be the best the USA has had in 15 years. He was a jr world champion. But Jr's fade as they move up to the men's senior. We'll see. He has a lot of hype next to his name. On the plus side he's from Philly.

    [url]http://www.teamusa.org/usa-boxing/athletes/Darmani-Rock[/url]
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Oh yeah Jack Gardner the Guardsman from Leics, take it from me there was nothing special about Jack.:lol:

    Prosecution rests :good
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Joshua isn't a world class fighter , he may be soon but not at the moment.Right now he is a promising 11 fight novice
    who hasn't been made to do anything by an opponent he doesn't want to..
    Pulev stinks,I said it before the Wlad fight and afterwards, he had all the mobility of a wardrobe in their fight and the head movement of a statue.
    Fury has shown remarkable improvement in his balance, foot work and boxing ability .but his power is only average and his chin is suspect.
    I think his big b*lls will carry him quite a way.
    He has a great ticker..
    Povetkin has some fundamentals, but his power is not much above average, his defence is just ok and his condition sometimes leaves a lot to be desired.At 35 he is unlikely to improve. I like Wilder, he impressed me with his movement and jab, but Stiverne fought an uninspired one dimentional fight that possibly flattered him,one thing he does have is top end power.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Wepner was a very respectable opponent for the 3 fight novice Foreman imo.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think that reflects more negatively on the abilities of Layne and Norkus than it does positively on the abilities of Brion:think
    NB Brion fought Norkus in1954 , 14 years after he 40's were finished.
     
  7. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Interesting thoughts on boxing history
     
  8. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    Doesn't mean he wasn't in fact rated for three years running.
     
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    McVey (Post 129)

    "Why not just provide your own list of names as they apply to the two eras"

    Okay. My criteria to make my list is to be champion, or to be rated in the top five of a yearly ranking, or if not in the top five, at least three years in the top ten, or specials for which I will give reasons.

    Top 25 for each decade

    1940's

    Joe Louis
    Max Baer
    Arturo Godoy
    Buddy Walker
    Billy Conn
    Lem Franklin
    Bob Pastor
    Melio Bettina
    Jimmy Bivins
    Tami Mauriello
    Turkey Thompson
    Roscoe Toles
    Harry Bobo
    Lee Q. Murray
    Curtis Sheppard
    Joe Baksi
    Elmer Ray
    Jersey Joe Walcott
    Ezzard Charles
    Lee Savold
    Joey Maxim
    Archie Moore*
    Harold Johnson*
    Buddy Baer*
    Lou Nova*

    Moore--Not rated at heavy in the 1940's, but beat Bivins, Walker, and Sheppard in the 1940's

    Johnson--Not rated at heavy, but beat Bivins and Godoy in the 1940's.

    Buddy Baer--Never in top five, but deserves spot because of great effort against Louis.

    Lou Nova--Never in top five in 1940's, but deserves spot for ending Max Baer's career.


    1970's

    Joe Frazier
    Muhammad Ali
    George Foreman
    Oscar Bonavena
    Jerry Quarry
    Mac Foster
    Jimmy Ellis
    Ron Lyle
    Floyd Patterson
    Ken Norton
    Joe Bugner
    Jimmy Young
    Duane Bobich
    Larry Holmes
    Leon Spinks
    John Tate
    Gerrie Coetzee
    Mike Weaver
    Earnie Shavers
    Jose Luis Garcia
    Chuck Wepner
    Alfredo Evangelista
    Ernie Terrell*
    Sonny Liston*
    Gerry C--ney*

    Garcia, Evangelista, and Wepner make the list by being rated three different years.

    Terrell--made a comeback against third-raters, but KO'd Garcia

    Liston--a name from the fifties and sixties, but did beat Wepner

    Gerry C--didn't beat anyone of note in the seventies, but who else is there?

    ***Just a point of clarity. There were 28 men who were ranked in the top five at one time or another in the 1940's. There were 19 in the 1970's. All the 1970's guys made it, but I knocked out several from the 1940's.
     
  10. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    "Prosecution rests."

    Hamilton Burger would be proud.
     
  11. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    So?

    There were more fighters per se in the 40's than there were in the 70's. So it stands to reason more would be ranked. The question is how high the 70's Heavies would have been ranked in that era, because I doubt more than half of those in your list ( 40's ) would have been ranked at all in that decade.

    Lets take Billy Conn for instance. He is no 5 on your list, I would confidently say that the first dozen guys you have listed in the 70's would beat Conn with ease.
     
  12. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    These lists are in historical order--just how soon they appeared in the yearly rankings.

    "There were more fighters per se in the 40's than there were in the 70's. So it stands to reason more would be ranked."

    Why? I don't think that follows at all. After all, a very small percentage in any era get into the top five.

    "I would confidently say that the first dozen guys you have listed in the 70's would beat Conn with ease."

    Jimmy Ellis? A 35 year old Patterson? Mac Foster? Bonavena? Quarry?

    with ease?

    Whatever. But I wouldn't bet my money on those guys winning at all against the Conn of 1941.
     
  13. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yes, he was.
    But was not a contender - or any description - then, or ever.
    imo.

    Obviously the RING magazine ratings people thought otherwise.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    He was, and he didn't deserve to be.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Why thank you :good

    I just looked him up as I didn't know who you were talking about,[I'm English].:lol: