Anyone travelling to Herning for Froch v Kessler travel details here

I'm sure every Froch fan owns a telly.

If Copenhagen is convenient for someone and Herning isn't, they should watch on the telly. Is there a flaw, something missing in my logic? Is there some particular reason Froch needs to have fans at his fights abroad when the majority of traveling pugilists (not just American ones) usually don't enjoy thIs luxury? Why is this even an issue in the first place? So silly.

 

War Kessler! :fire

 

The British tend to support our fighters rather than just sit and watch them...its no criticism just a bit of a cultural difference between you and us :thumbsup

Herning isn't just inconvenient, its completely out in the boondocks and will probably require dogs and sled to get there. If Kessler wants more people to attend he should fight in the UK where we have more than adequate facilities, its not our fault that Denmark is so backwards.

PS **** Kessler :deal

 

Well, your thoughtful comments are certainly more appreciated than those of the "**** off you ****" ilk.

Needless to say, we'll need to agree to disagree here. Even taking cultural differences into account (and we're not as far apart as you may think; people here frequently plan voyages to Las Vegas from upwards of 2000 miles away for huge events...difference being that Vegas is usually a neutral locale for both parties) it's almost unheard of in my experience for boxing fans to complain about the accessibility of a location on the home turf of their man's opponent. This is literally the first time it's ever come up, to my recollection.