Anyone want a Perma ban for Golovkin vs Canelo?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tyson379, Aug 31, 2017.


  1. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    How about we ban them anyways lol?
     
  2. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,042
    Jan 22, 2015
    :nonono:fufu
     
    thesmokingm likes this.
  3. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,042
    Jan 22, 2015
    I'll do a money bet via PayPal bet too...
     
  4. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,239
    240,741
    Nov 23, 2013
    No, you're triggered, always, all it takes is for someone to speak this simple word with a negative connotation, CANELO, and its off to the races. And you clearly give two shits Kevin Valencia, that's why you keep bringing it up. I'm loud and obnoxious, I'm perfectly aware of that, unfortunately you don't realize you're loud and obnoxious, that's what makes you unhinged, I'm aware of my every flaw, you are oblivious to all of yours.

    I don't do ban bets because I'm not easily triggered by your macho tough guy talk that you attempt to bully lesser men with that can't control their emotions, like you. Also what's the point of doing a ban bets with you Kevin Valencia? After all, since this forum means so little to you, its not like the moment you're banned you'd go alt up right Kevin Valencia, you'd easily be able to pull yourself away from the forum for a month, right Kevin Valencia?

    Dude, you're so much of a ****ing joke, even Ellerbe who usually hates on GGG, can't stand you and wants to ban bet you. He called you out, well take him up on it, you little weak *****.
     
    greenhornet likes this.
  5. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    I don't know him personally. I don't think he has ownership of my chain.
     
  6. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    I always imagined the expression as merely meaning that the person is teasing. The imagery-as I understand it, is of a prisoner being chained in a dungeon and someone annoying him by yanking on the chain. So that's the sense that I was using it. If understood otherwise I apologize.
     
  7. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    no reason to apologize.. I see what you meant. I was just joking back. The fact someone would want to be banned to prove he is right about a fight makes no sense.. Fights like this are hard to predict. I really don't know who will win. If Canelo has the skills everyone says he has, he will win a decision...
     
    Radrook likes this.
  8. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    I will say this, I have not been excited about a fight like this for a long time. Both guys have been dominant and haven't shown many weaknesses. The only things I see is Canelo those early rounds against Khan and GGG with Jacobs. but Canelo is smaller than Jacobs and moving up... And GGG is not as fast as Khan. This has the making of an unpredictable result. Similar to Hagler vs. Hearns, yet Hagler vs. Hearns in retrospect was dictated by the prefight hate Marvin and Tommy had for each other. I actually think the prefight stuff came into the fight and that great fight we had was due to that.. They did not fight skills, they fought more angry and that is why it was a brawl from the get go. I don't see these guys GGG and Canelo fighting like that from round one, but if GGG starts to hit Canelo then he will take over and swarm him.. Canelo has to start off and try to use his jab. What a great fight this will be. I just hope there will be no injuries in the last 2 weeks to postpone it. I will say this GGG is a rather open fight and Canelo will hit him as the rounds go by. How GGG reacts to this, and if he can take over will be interesting.. There hasn't been a great fight like this with this great a style matchup in many many years..
     
  9. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    Your insecurity is what annoys me. You take everything to heart and youve made this place into a joke because you use your bias in moderating. A mod should know how to seperate his bias from his moderating.
     
  10. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    You will?

    You taking Canelo?

    Youre one of the select few id trust enough on this site to bet with....
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,042
    Jan 22, 2015
    Id do a friendly bet... what did you have in mind? And yes, im rolling with Canelo All the way!
     
  12. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,029
    27,662
    Jul 26, 2004
    Man you should go to vegas I think canelos the underdog you could probably get decent odds.

    Ill pm you when i get a chance :)
     
  13. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    The psychological euphoria that is generated from having won the bet is the glorious reward.:risas3:
     
  14. C.J.

    C.J. Boxings Living Legend revered & respected by all Full Member

    46,772
    15,890
    Apr 14, 2009
    Not making any bets but if I was I'd take GGG TKO 10
     
  15. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,239
    240,741
    Nov 23, 2013
    No its my lack of insecurity that annoys you, because once again, you're projecting. I have zero doubt Golovkin will win, and went as far as writing a ****ing article called Canelo cannot beat Golovkin you idiot, does that sound like insecurity to you? Its you who's insecure and terrified Canelo will get KTFO, which is why you're so hyper sensitive when anyone says that. You can say GGG loses all you want, I don't give a damn, because I'm hat confident. I've never done ban bets with anyone, and never will, even on the surest of sure things, because I think they're ****ing gat and pointless. I show zero bias in my moderating, ask most of the posters on here that disagree with me, they're all still here.