You are not allowed to say that kind of thing here. Dont you read the forum? Dont you know that if you outbox 'Frochy' its seen as cheating here? At the end of the day, Froch won. Brit ESB likes this fact & is now in the process of sweeping the controversy under the carpet to suit their own nationalistic agendas. Its ok for Khan to run. Its NOT ok for Dirrell to run. Thats how we roll in here. OK??? Now go back to the general forum, we are busy sweeping Frochs mess under the carpet. sweep sweep...
Christ what is this drivel, is Hatton had come out with that he would've been nailed on here. Going on about how he is a whisker away, why the bloody hell is that something to brag about? I wont even get started on the 'beat him at his own game' line, would that be through very slick counter punching then Carl? The line about adapting made me laugh, he was jus tthe same plodder he always is.
All I can say is, Dirrell must have had bigger whiskers than that cat in your avatar going by Frochs logic.
Had enough of Frochs excuses. seems like he's convinced himself that he didn't get completely outclassed.
He's setting himself up for a big fall against Kessler, if he thinks Kessler is just going to stand toe to toe with him next.
When Dirrell fakes a fight, he holds on for dear life, runs like Hell, falls down on canvas, and complains to referee!
Different situation. Calzaghe wasn't running, holdng, dropping to knees, turning away against Hopkins. If a fighter want's to use those tactics fair enough but IMO he deserves what he gets.
This is getting ****ing out of hand...the longer this **** goes on the wider that Dirrell "won" the fight by...first its 1 or 2 rounds, then its 3 or 4, i've even seen some idiot saying that Dirrell won by 6 clear. Now we have the Froch was "completely outclassed" gambit, which is just not true, not even close.