Are Hatton and Cotto ATG's

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Feb 5, 2010.


  1. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Both are too limited to be considered ATGs.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    top 100
     
  3. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    A fighter who fights the best in his respective division and has success, moves up in weight and defeats other greats, wins a fight as a huge underdog .......stuff like that.
     
  4. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    That's odd criterias though.. If we want to classify fighters as either ATG or NOT ATG, we need to say: OK, is he amongst the best 50 ever or something like that?
     
  5. fletch2069

    fletch2069 Member Full Member

    451
    0
    Jun 21, 2008
  6. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    There is no way to put ATG's in a particular order. I tried a few times to make a list of the top 20, 50 and 100 and then had too many guys left over that I felt needed to be there. It's too debatable really.
     
  7. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    in my mind they both still have to do some winning to be in the Hall of Fame. A HOF fighter does not lose his two biggest fights in the last 2 years as Cotto has. Cotto is a very good fighter, but HOF is a pretty high standard or should be. And Hatton lost his last 2 big fights.
     
  8. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009
    No, Cotto can POSSIBLY be an ATG, if he beats Pacquiao in a rematch and beats Mayweather, but I don't see that happening.

    Hatton is a ****ing piece of ****, he's nowhere near being a ATG boxer.
     
  9. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I dont think they are but they are damn good fighters though!:good
     
  10. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    no doubt hall of famers, but atg is for the group that beat them. no shame in being a hall of famer tho.
     
  11. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    A piece of ****? Shut up you prawn
     
  12. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    haha I am said poster! Come on guys, flame on! My general point is that 20 years from now, Hatton and Cotto, by boxing media in general will be recognised as ATG's. Top 150 fighters at the very least. I said Marquez would also be recognised as an ATG, to which the OP disagreed.
     
  13. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    No. Both are quality fighters, especially Cotto, but not ATG level. An ODLH, Tito or young Mosely would absolutely decimate and clean out this WW division, let alone an SRL. Hatton's a decent 140 champ, not much more.
     
  14. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Yes to JMM, he is several levels above Hatton or Cotto p4p.
     
  15. SteveO

    SteveO MSW Full Member

    4,255
    14
    Feb 4, 2007
    HOF? Yes.

    ATG? I don't think so. I like Hatton, and I'm sure the Brits will hold him in high regard, maybe not Henry Cooper high regard, but high nonetheless.

    Cotto still has a career in front of him. Time will tell, but I don't see him being an ATG. Some of his best wins are close and, depending on who's talking, undeserved.