Are Pacquiao's accomplishments @ 147 really "that much" better than pbf's?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sp550i, Sep 7, 2010.


  1. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    personally, i think the point was to make cotto and he green corner focus more on making that weight than to focus on training
     
  2. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    actually, people are saying


    if you CAN fight at the full limit, don't fight at a catch weight


    if you can fight margo at 150 and clottey at 147, why did you need cotto at 145


    pac, arun, and the wbc are making boxing a spectacle
     
  3. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    Add the circumstances of when and why, how they fought.

    /thread
     
  4. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    he did fought at full 147 after testing the waters with cotto didn't he?
     
  5. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    and 150?


    he fought ODLH at 147....the *******s scream how great a victory this was...so if it was so great and legit...why not fight cotto at 147?


    he tested the 147 waters with ODLH

    no need to bring cotto down to 145
     
  6. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    :good
     
  7. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    man DLH came in like a ghost in that ring, i dont see it as a real test. pacman gets the credit of fighting DLH alone, just the balls of fighting him is enough credit, no one thought that DLH would come in like that :good
     
  8. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    hey...respect for admitting that

    agree or disagree, at least you are a man who can debate w/o being a hypocrite
     
  9. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Really? That's understandable... We'll see how many people feel Mayweather should get the credit when he beats Pacman... even though "he's smaller"... **** I think I even heard someone complain bcuz "this year is Pacquiao's prime" lol...
     
  10. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    both fighter pacman and floyd are on the hill as they say, you can never tell if they are on the way down :good

    hell alot of people think that a 28 year old fighter is already shot considering all the wars that he is been on.
     
  11. cloud_cyc

    cloud_cyc p4p demon Full Member

    2,802
    0
    Jul 12, 2009
    ...just trying to balance it :good
     
  12. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    You can't. But to already make an excuse that Pacman will not be in his prime next year is lame.
     
  13. JUSTAFIGHTFAN

    JUSTAFIGHTFAN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,794
    0
    May 1, 2009
    DLH win by Pac is much better than floyd's, a no brainer comparison if you know the history.

    If you count Hatton, a win by Pac is much better since it's Hatton's best weight

    Pac's win w/ Cotto **** over floyd's win over Mosely, Cotto a more prime fighter, and now a JMW at that. Mosely suddenly shows being old and gone w/ floyd.

    A LW JMM? you've got to be kidding.

    Clottey won that fight w/ Baldomir except he was robed.

    Clottey vs Judah is a no brainer, Clottey beat him.

    That's besides floyd's 5 years being WW and Manny's only 2 and still be facing Margarito whom floyd ducked.
     
  14. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    :rofl


    and this ladies and gentleman, is the definition of "*******"
     
  15. JUSTAFIGHTFAN

    JUSTAFIGHTFAN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,794
    0
    May 1, 2009
    And