Are Pacquiao's accomplishments @ 147 really "that much" better than pbf's?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sp550i, Sep 7, 2010.


  1. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,461
    14,018
    Mar 5, 2006
    2 knockouts, 1 decision..vs 3 UD's..
     
  2. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Whats the thread title? Did it say @147? or @145? <<< don't be stupid.
     
  3. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006
    jr welter 140

    welter 147

    unless Camp Arum & Pac change it.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch Don't just make blanket statements dip****. If you can, and I really doubt you willk be able to, in fact, I predict you'll just make a ***** asss reply, or none at all....

    But what gives you the impression Cotto was dehydrated? Try answer that without sounding like a smart ass. Good luck.
     
  5. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Who cares if it wasn't the welter limit you spaz. Both sides agreed that it was fair. Cotto said he felt great at the weight, AFTER the fight ; so why is this even relevant?
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    No those are the limits. Welter is 141-147. The guy in your avatar has fought at catchweights.
     
  7. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006

    state the facts people ...Damn 2 of which Floyd beat 1st.
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Pac's beat Oscar, Cotto and Clottey

    Compared to

    Hatton, Mosley, JMM, Baldomir, Judah, Mitchell.


    The Oscar and JMM fights were jokes.

    Leaving Manny with two quality wins. Which don't overtake what Mayweather has done.

    And this isn't hating on Pacquiao. What he's done at WW is very good. Destroying Cotto was a major feat for him. But Mayweather has done more at 147 than Pac. It's quite obvious.

    Pac is still greater.
     
  9. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    They are the limits you clown, you know, the maximum?:-(
     
  10. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    6,312
    0
    Dec 1, 2009

    Two of which? Meaning Oscar and who?
     
  11. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Funny that Pacquiao fought Cotto at 145 pounds but fought Clottey at a ww limit. Cotto is a real class act in which he won't make excuses if he wins or lose. But again this thread is about If Pacquiao accomplishment @ 147 pounds really that much better then Floyd? Note it says "@147" <<<Where does it say "@145"?
     
  12. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Pac did it in 2 years, it took Floyd 5 years. Give Pac 5 years at the time Floyd went into the division, and he'd have racked up 6 or more quality opponents. Floyd's WW resume is trash for how long he's been around the division. He should have at least a Cotto or Margarito on his resume, but he ran off into retirement.
     
  13. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    You are just saying things that Floyd has said in past interviews. A question to all Floyd fans........why can't you form your own opinion? Are you too weak as a person and too much of a follower? You all just repeat what Floyd says.

    I mean, does following Floyd make you feel better or more important? If so, why?

    Would love to know.
     
  14. twofear

    twofear Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,140
    0
    Jun 19, 2010
    so cotto weight in at 146 in almost all of his WW fights is not at welter weight right? :good
     
  15. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Yup in late of Leonard career when he fought Hearns in a rematch at a super middleweight in which that was 2 years after Leonard fought Hagler in a no bs catchweight.