Are people becoming a little hypocritical when it comes to Usyk?

First off your boy lost a wide decision and was not competitive and gave up his belt because he couldn't handle AJ boxing ability.

Here you are slagging Usyk for potentially taking a rematch with AJ if they both win their respective fights and if they do they would be ranked 1 and 2 at heavyweight. then say you want to see AJ rematch an uncompetitive fighter like Parker? Why your boy lost bad, and is not even in possession of a title, talk about engaging in a pointless rematch after a very one sided match (you supposedly hate rematches like that yet sure as **** change your story when it comes to Parker.)

Now some proof.. when did Usyk say he would fight Joshua after fury even if he lost to Dubious.

Now on to Wallin, you may not like him due to your extreme bias but he was 26 and 1 and ranked in the top ten.. And Chisora was 34-13 at the time and not ranked, losing 4 of his last 6 fights yeah they are equal alright... you are so inconsistent with your criteria its pathetic really.

 

Usyk is happy to fight AJ again because he has honour about him, AJ gave him a chance when he could have dodged him so he isn't going to do bad by a bloke that gave him his shot.

Usyk is no Fury.

 

let's take this slowly as it seems things go over your head easily. AJ is ranked 3 behind Usyk and Fury, if Fury loses the rematch he would drop from number two to probably just shy of the top 5 that would make Joshua if he defeats Dubious and fury loses #2 in the division behind Usyk.

So why do you think Parker should get a rematch against AJ when he was thoroughly uncompetive in the first fight, does Parker have a Title? is he ranked higher then Joshua? do people even see a path to victory for parker who does not have the power and has shown to be an inferior boxer in their fight?

Hell Fury just lost to Usyk does that mean he should not get a rematch?

The real reason is you are a Parker supporter who hates that he got handled by Joshua rather easily so now you have to go to idiotic lengths to discredit Joshua, Pathetic.

and to further debunk your double standard. if the roles were reversed and Usyk held the titles and Joshua was the mandatory who just moved up in weight and signed a contract with extra money to have a rematch clause then yes it would of looked the same.

 

Parker actually does have a title. The WBO interim belt he won from Zhang.

Joshua is better than Parker. The champ has two clear wins over Joshua. Hes never fought Parker who is interim belt holder. It doesn't matter that AJ is better. Joshua should not be getting shots at Usyk. If Fury wins sure thing but if you go down 0-2 in a series and one of the fight wasn't a robbery that should be the end.

 

On the contrary my friend, I've been supporting the sport all the way back since teenage me could cuts yards to order a Tyson fight that lasted 89 seconds. I'm a fan enough of boxing that I want what's best for the fighter in the latter stages of their careers.