Yeah Canelo gassed and looked hurt in those rounds but are you going to throw out what he did from 1-9? It's kind of odd because in the first fight Canelo dominated GGG most of 10-12 besides 11, but you guys remembered everything GGG did. Give a fair shake to both fighters. Also this PED bs needs to stop. Canelo looked the same.
no. theyre calling it a robbery because they told everyone who would listen that ggg was going to ko canelo.
Exactly. GGG won the first, Canelo won the second. Granted I missed rounds 3 and 6, Canelo just seemed to have won more rounds. And no, I'm not going to re-watch this one and look for rounds. I'm done with this saga. 1-1 in my books. Maybe you'll understand what I mean now when I say this forum is so biased and agenda driven. And no one can accuse me of having an agenda for Canelo when I had GGG clearly winning the 1st.
i had ggg winning the first one too, but canelo outboxed him, took the fight to him, took his best shots no problem, and kept up with him when ggg won a rd.
He didn't just outbox him he walked him the **** down. Lol GGG looked like a ***** going back until Canelo gassed.
Canelo owes this victory to Sanchez cause he dared him to go toe-to-toe. Still scratching my head as to what happened to GGG tonight, no "Mexican Style".
Come on man. I was in the 50/50 fight, slightly give GGG the edge due to his clear win last time and his durability. But how can you see that fight as not a Golovkin win? Which 6 or more rounds, did you have Canelo in? I'd love to know
I think it's similar to the Kova-Ward scenario wherein GGG's won rounds looked far more convincing, because I'd say a good 8/12 rounds of the fight were separated by a hair. But I aint got beef, I had rounds 1 and 3 10-10, so i was happy with either man getting the nod.
Honestly, I was shocked GGG "ran" the whole fight. Note how I only use "running", when a fanbase or a team condemns movement but then their fighter refuses to stand in the pocket.
