Are Skip Bayless and Stephen A. Smith respected experts?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrSpeaker89, Dec 20, 2013.


  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    bottom line is neither of them should ever talk about boxing.....a real boxing fan knows within 30 seconds when a guy doesnt know **** about the subject...which they dont
     
  2. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    They are both disgracefully uninformed and have absolutely no idea what is going in the sport outside Mayweather vs Pacquiao. I bet Skip Bayless doesn't even know who Adrien Broner, Miguel Cotto or Danny Garcia are.
     
  3. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    563
    Dec 2, 2013
    they're highly respected in kindergartens and insane asylums.
     
  4. Phanekim

    Phanekim Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,929
    8
    Jan 6, 2007
    i find casual a stretch but sas seems to knw a little more.
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    oh shut the **** up. He praises Johnny Manziel and Aaron Rodgers all the time. He mainly is a basketball analysis, so of course most of the guys he supports are gonna be black.
     
  6. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,692
    11,866
    Jan 16, 2013
    Black supremacists and their Jewish sidekicks always make for the most imfornative and impartial sources.
     
  7. motownsiu

    motownsiu Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,009
    4
    May 6, 2009
    No. I would like for uncle roger to go on that show and tell them ykdsab.
    I think most people on this board are more qualified then those two jackasses.
     
  8. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Neither are experts, but Smith at least knows when a fighter is clearly outboxing the other.
    Their show on ESPN is designed for the casual sportfan to get a laugh.

    I find myself embarrassed for Bayless when he talks about any sport. He knows very little about any sport and much less about boxing.
    The only two fighters Bayless ever mentions are Pacquiao and Mayweather.
    After Marquez knocked out Pacquiao, Bayless on one of his shows was talking about needing Pacquiao to face Marquez in a fourth fight and make matters right after Marquez got in his lucky shot.
    Goes to show how much Bayless knows about boxing.
    1. Marquez shot was'nt lucky
    and
    2. Another fight would mean a 5th fight and not the fourth Bayless was talking about.

    Its beyond my comprehension why Bayless is employed as a sports analyst on a sports channel of all things. :patsch:nut
     
  10. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    No, Bayless is right near par with the *******s on this board and Smith knows more about boxing than 80% of the clowns on this board.
    In case you have'nt noticed this board has gone to **** the last year so so.