Yes they are both are good or they wouldnt of beaten some of the names they already have. How good they are we just dont know yet. Not seen anything exeptional in either of them to suggest they are guna dominate divisions but time will tell. They come across like a right pair of bell ends though so i can see myself wathing them fight in the hope they get knocked out.
I thought GGG edged Canelo so I will reveal some biased as to who has the better wins on the resume vs Charlo
Golovkin wasnt hyped up early in his career, he was hyped up after a continuous row of knock outs against decent and ranked opposition, and he never once beat a cripple. Charlos are getting hyped up already with out having the same success early in their careers.
Boxing doesn't work like that. I would say Lemieux has the better record than Trout, better wins outside of Cotto. Infact outside of Cotto who is Trouts next big W? Does Zahir Raheem have a better resume than JLC? He has the better victory in Morales.....does this consist of him being the better fighter?
Wrong! The Charlo's only very recently started to get hype and even then it's very small. How many Charlo threads did you see around here 1 or 2 years ago?
That hype is not warranted though. Too many people are proclaiming them supermen already, I though you guys would learn especially after Jeff Lacy got exposed.
Morales was shot to **** when Raheem beat him Cotto wasn't big difference there. Trout was a long time title holder at 154 before losing his belts to Canelo. BTW Lemieux isn't a better P4P fighter than Trout is who the hell has he beat?
Jeff Lacy was years ago and hadn't beat anyone of note and he was limited as hell. The Charlo Twins aren't limited and are far more complete than Lacy was. Lastly, Trout is better than anyone Lacy ever beat. Horrible comparison.
Well you actually responded with sense to complete garbage , just trying to keep the spirit of blizzy alive lol
You're just plain wrong sorry and those that co-sign your thoughts are also incorrect. Unfortunately there’s no infallible study that we can conduct to truly debunk your point of view so we'll have to live with the disagreement. If you find a way to quantify hype levels and run a ad hoc report then do a compare n contrast of the Charlo/GGG then maybe we can run a poll. Until then it’s all speculative and of course we should add in the fact that everyone including their mothers have a grasp of your subjective train of thought, especially when evaluating American born fighters.