Are the Klitschko brothers overrated because they fight in such a terrible division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Swann, Oct 2, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    4
    May 11, 2009
    I been reading this **** for months and months now... Im starting to think the Klitch make the division look bad.
     
    Xerant, Oct 2, 2009
    Xerant, Oct 2, 2009
    #31
  2. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Another ******ed hate thread from ESB's resident transexual racist.

    Oh yay.
     
    rushman, Oct 2, 2009
    rushman, Oct 2, 2009
    #32
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    I certainly don't overrate them. I see them for what they are.... Vitali is a truly great fighter IMO who lacks the depth in this current division so unfortunately we can't see what he's truly capable of from an all-time great standpoint. So he's a great fighter, but an all-time great? I don't know.

    Wlad on the other hand I only consider king of the bums.. and that's not a compliment.
     
    J.R., Oct 2, 2009
    J.R., Oct 2, 2009
    #33
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,105
    4,100
    Jul 19, 2004
    Klitschkos are very underrated. They would have beaten Holmes, Ali, you name them.
     
    Farmboxer, Oct 2, 2009
    Farmboxer, Oct 2, 2009
    #34
  5. Phirsole

    Phirsole Member Full Member

    458
    0
    Sep 28, 2009
    Best post I've read for a while.

    How does a sprinter shine in todays olympics, even if he can run the 100m below 10 sec, when he competes against U. Bolt? How to shine in tennis, if you compete with Federer?

    The Klitschkos are head and shoulders above the divison. It's difficult to determine the quality of the division, if the No. #3-#10 are no real challenges to the #1-#2.
     
    Phirsole, Oct 2, 2009
    Phirsole, Oct 2, 2009
    #35
Page 3 of 3