Normally you can be a decent debate poster but today you're just slinging ****. I merely asked you to name 15 better Heavys than Wlad or 25 better than Vitali based on reumés..................you apparently can't do it.
Every day dude. You always show up claiming you have nothing against the Klits but than you agree with those that bash them.
You know, a better response would be to make some witty remark. I suspect that would be beyond your level of intellect though. I await your childish, expletive filled retort with baited breath.
I don't have any idea where you'd place either Klitschko all time. MOst of the hardcore haters claim neither is an all time great and neither is worthy of the hall of fame.
Obviously the brothers factor is very bad for the division, but they certainly haven't ruined anything. They are the only quality fighters in the division, the only real problem is that there isn't more of them.
That's true to a degree but Chagaev, Dimentrenko, Arreola, Haye & some others do have talent. We just need them to fight each other to weed out the pretenders from the contenders.
Regardless, both of us find the time to post on a sport we profess to love. We have more in common than not. Debate is largely what these pages are for.............right?
Head to head I believe either Klitschko is a tough fight for any Heavy in history. Here's why: They both are huge, use their size well, they both have power in both hands and they are always in great shape. With the exception of the 1st Brewster fight anyway.................:yep But that's a another story.
HOWS THIS.... **** YOU:yep.. is that what you are talking about?.... I want to be sure to give you what you want. Dont want you to leave upset:|:|