Are the past Eras overrated or the new generation just not that good?

This is what you said, genius:

So that is NOT YOU saying that Loma could toy with and annihilate previous eras of LW’s?

Oh dear.

You don’t even remember what you’ve typed.

How embarrassing.

 

I’ve never thought much of Floyd so that’s the wrong example. Would LW Crawford beat up Floyd? Absolutely. Would 154lb Spence beat up Floyd? Absolutely (and already did in sparring).

Why are you shrinking the comparison? I talked about the 90s and earlier, with a focus on the 60s. Why are you now trying to make this about the 00s?

 

Ha!

I despair.

I have put forward a number of fighters and divisions for you to consider.

Whereas all you can muster is more absolute nothingness.

You are an utter embarrassment.

Log off.

 

How embarrassing. I was talking about a group of fighters and you’ve decided to pluck out an individual fighter from the list lol

 

I’m talking about the 00’s, because that was 20 years ago, and you keep telling me that the sport keeps progressing.

Keep up.

 

Okay.

We’ll choose another one then, genius.

Ha!

What difference does it make which one I choose?

 

Are you really this slow? This is not about fighters and divisions, you can name any superhero you choose. The argument is about boxing as a whole and how it’s clearly superior today. This is about a process, not your daddy vs his daddy in the 50s.

 

Yes you really are slow, that’s exactly my point. Is there as much progress in 20 years as in 30 years? No, so why are you turning it into 20 years now? Answer the question luv, acting arrogant and superior while tucking and dodging, changing the discussion from the group to a single fighter, from past generations to now 20 years ago… (and a fighter who has just retired really)..
and still not a single argument made. From your posts I honestly think you’re just a bit ‘special’, and you’re frustrated because you can’t think through what you believe. Hence the emotional rambling assertions and shifting of goalposts. Have a great day luv

 

Absolutely no difference, and that’s exactly my point ffs lololol

 

Oh my.

You’re all over the place.

I have highlighted exactly what you have typed.

You said that they would toy with and annihilate any era.

You didn’t specify a certain period in time.

You said ANY era.

So if you don’t want to be questioned or embarrassed, then STOP talking NONSENSE.

 

Haha!

The irony in this post is hilarious.

You are the one that’s moving the goal posts.

You’re now upset because I pulled you on your ridiculous comment about Loma etc.

Oh, I’m sorry, you don’t want me to choose Loma?

I’ll choose someone else then.

Why am I choosing 20 years?

I’ve already explained why.

Because all throughout the thread, you have repeatedly said that the sport keeps progressing. Or are you now going to deny that?

So if the sport keeps progressing, then 20 years is a significant amount of time.

So I asked you if you think that Floyd (as a LW) could compete with today’s LW’s.

Shall I get some pen and paper and draw it out for you?

Or can you comprehend what I’m saying?

If we go back another 10 years, I can ask you if you think that Pea could compete with today’s LW’s.

It was you who said ANY era.

So then what difference does it make how many years I specify??

I am merely asking you different questions to try and understand your level of thinking.

So let us be clear:

Do you think that the sport continues to progress?

Or do you think that it did progress, but that it hasn’t done for a while?

Which one?

 

Ha!

WTF?

Why on earth did you make such a ridiculous comment then??

Okay then.

I’ll choose Crawford.

I’m a big fan of his.

I’m praying that he fights Errol at the end of the year.

That would be awesome.

Terrence is great.

However, you said that he would toy with and annihilate guys from ANY OTHER era.

Not pre-50’s.

Not pre-80’s

ANY OTHER era.

You have said that.

Yet we can’t question you on that, as it’s been taken out of context?

Ha!

This is just a lesson for you to THINK before you type.

I’m one of Crawford’s biggest fans. But he has done NOTHING for you to suggest that he’d have toyed with everyone.

Also, what makes you so certain that he’d have beaten Floyd?

 

@Pimp C

 

Not even worth responding to he's a hardcore pbf hater. I don't have the energy today. Pbf beats both.

 

You’ve debated him before?