Are there any good reasons why pro boxing in its current form should not be banned?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Nov 25, 2008.


  1. Clearly Cool

    Clearly Cool Active Member Full Member

    1,210
    2
    Jan 8, 2007
    Malinaggi didn't have a substantial chance of winning the fight. If he had some stopping power then maybe it would not be justified, but Mcgirt knew he didn't. Calzaghe Lacy went on because Lacy has KO power, he had a slight chance to catch Calzaghe....Malinaggi didn't even have that.

    Good stoppage.
     
  2. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    Did McGirt not say that he was gonna stop it if Malignaggi didn't start throwing punches.

    As you say, it's a fight, if your not fighting not much point in being there.

    He could have let it go but at the same time it wasn't much of a contest by then.
     
  3. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Who cares what McGirt said? The guy was payed to fight or take a beating for 12 rounds, unless the fight was stopped earlier on safety grounds. He wasn't getting hurt or injured, so there was no reason to stop the fight on safety grounds. Not much of a contest? Who gives a ****? I was quite enjoying seeing Malignaggi get hit in the mouth. I didn't care he could no longer win the fight one bit. People payed money to watch this fight. It was no charity event either. The fight should not have been stopped.

    As to Lennox, what would he say if he would have been stopped as soon as he had been knocked down in any of his fights? Everyone knows that a HW punch is really damaging. Would he have liked to be stopped as soon as he touched the canvas? I bet not. Hypocrite! So I guess I'm a keyboard warrior now, that I criticise the brave, great man?! **** off!
     
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Crap stoppage. By your argument, as soon as a fighter who is not deemed to have one-punch KO power loses 7 rounds, the fight should be stopped. That's bull****.
     
  5. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    So were you not happy to see him whinging at the end more than he would have been had it just been a simple KO or points win.

    I thought he was a dick and was pleased to see him pissed off to the max, feeling hard done to as well as getting punched about the mouth the entire fight.
     
  6. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    In my opinion the argument "he no longer had a chance of winning the fight" is definitely not a valid argument when stopping a fight. If this becomes a trend then there would be a ridiculous amount of unnecessary stoppages.

    Although with that said, if Paulie was so pissed about the fight being stopped, he should have thrown some bloody punches. Expect to see questionable stoppages happen a lot more frequently throughout the future of the sport though, the more severe injuries that occur the more pressure there will be on referees and corners to stop fights when a fighter clearly cannot win the fight, and is only taking additional punishment for the sake of finishing the fight.
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    No...I didn't want to see him humiliated through no fault of his own. I wanted to see him get beaten up. :bart
     
  8. bachatu

    bachatu Pro Full Member

    4,779
    8
    Feb 25, 2006
    You know that is an unfair and irrational comparison. The chances from a person dying from a bullet wound to the head is much greater than a punch, especially a punch with gloves.

    In boxing, there are techniques that can prevent one from being punched as often - such as bobbing, blocking with your guard, moving out of punching range. What techniques are utilized in Russian roulette to reduce the force of a bullet?

    Anyhow, to answer your question on the thread, boxing is a controlled sport. Measures are taken to protect the boxers. IT isnt a bar brawl or street fight where if one guy knocks the other one down, they can just jump on them or kick them. Because its a controlled sport, they have rules to limit damage incurred by boxers. How many times do we have fights that are stopped by a ref or a doctor? How bout stopped by the corner? or stopped for the reason of a cut?
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    If this philosophy becomes established and becomes a trend, boxing will change for ever, for the worse. Might as well turn it into a contest by amateur rules, where the only things that count is tapping your opponent with the white part of the glove on an area that counts. But who the hell is interested in that? Might as well watch dancing or synchronised swimming/diving or rhythmic gymnastics.
     
  10. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    The gloves are there to protect the hands not the face/head of the opponent!:nono
     
  11. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    Fair enough.

    I was pleased that it goes down as a stoppage though. He deserved it to be....dunno if you heard him after it whining about being "better than getting stopped" but was he ****. He wasn't fighting just trying to buy time and avoid getting hurt......His tactics were only marginally better than Hopkins rolling about holding his dick pretending he'd been hit there.
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Slavery still flourishes on this planet. So, we can force slaves to fight to the death?
     
  13. bachatu

    bachatu Pro Full Member

    4,779
    8
    Feb 25, 2006
    If it was only to protect your hand then they would build a cast around them with tape to protect them. There is a reason why they have higher oz gloves as the weight goes up, as the power of the fighter goes up.
     
  14. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Yes. Since I will never watch him ever again, I wanted to see him get beaten up for the extra 2 rounds at the end, instead of being saved to "entertain another day"...:dead
     
  15. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    No. A cast would lead to cuts and that would stop the brutality early. Bad for business.