Touché sir still I think the issue here are the predeterminations made by posters without concrete empirical evidence of an impending robbery in favor of the supposed house fighter.
For the scoring defenders here, I took the liberty to search for the RBR's and compare the consensus scores to the judges' scores at the time of the stoppages. They're not even in the ballpark. Wilder vs Washington > consensus score in rbr 40-36 or 39-37 Washington. Judges' scores 39-37 Wilder, 2x 38-38 even. https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...rett-hurd-vs-tony-harrison-rbr.582262/page-42 Wilder vs Szpilka > consensus score in rbr 78-74 Szpilka. Judges' scores 77-75, and 2x 78-74 Wilder. https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...-glazkov-vs-charles-martin-rbr.557143/page-55 Wilder vs Ortiz > consensus score in rbr 87-83 or 86-84 Ortiz. Judges' scores 3x 85-84 Wilder. https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...irrel-vs-josé-uzcátegui-ii-rbr.602969/page-72
Yep that pretty much sums it up. I'm not usually one for thinking a robbery is going to happen just because it's not in a neutral venue, I had no real issues with the scoring for GGG/Canelo or Ward/Kovalev fights unlike many, but I'd be a fool not to be wary of the scoring for this fight given the track record.