I voted yes, boxing wouldn't be as exciting if we didn't get to see glass like his get smashed around the ring every once in a while! He's one of those special type of fighters that could be a 1/100 underdog in a fight and I'd still pay to see it, just cause I love watching him lose! He isn't as good as his record indicates... He is a product of management and Al Haymon, not really a good boxer. :happy
What do the following facts about Broner suggest? 1. He refused to do VADA testing before the Paulie fight 2. He has a head that has grown massively and is now the size of a pumpkin 3. He's has had rapid muscle gain in the upper body 4. He has a spotty back 5. He has a spotty face 6. He has a bloated appearance 7. He has had rapid move up in weight classes 8. He drops a lot of weight just a couple of weeks before his fights 9. He has a lack of neck 10. He has an associated known Black US fighters under the GBP banner who have been caught using PEDs 11. He tries to copy everything that Mayweather does except demanding OSDT 12. He has commitment to compulsive cheating as seen in his fights. 13. He will do anything to gain an advantage including punching a 60 year old woman in the face for $40 Hmmmm......:think:think:think:think:think
They suggest he is a lost little boy who wants to be like Floyd. But AB would never stoop so low as to cheat like Floyd and Manny :nono
How would Broner fanboys from the USA feel if he came to the ring to this music: [YT]guG9cVs3ms4[/YT] :soccerredatriot
If he beats Porter in a close fight (which is totally possible) he is going to act like he is the GOAT... So no I'll never be a fan... But I treat him as a WWE act and get enjoyment out of it... He is a good boxer don't get me wrong but he shouldn't really be holding a belt any time soon at 140 or 147. If he is then politics will have gifted him it as with his first belt. I'm going to be in stitches if Porter pulls a quick one and beats him down with his bumrushes and Broner is defenseless with his slow feet and low workrate. Suddently the realization that he can't do what Brook did hits him as with Maidana he couldn't do what Khan or Alexander did. :hey:scaredas: Broner either sees something in Porter which he thinks he can exploit to box to victory or he has totally underestimated the job Brook did and the beneficial effects of a catchweight. Porter should beat him...but I think Porter himself is somewhat overrated...he isn't very adaptable.