Are you for or Against Catch Weight fights?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JohnAnthony, Aug 25, 2011.


  1. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    dont let an alphabet soup worthless tin paper peice of tinfoil get the in the way of boxing tradition homey:p

    oscar v hopkins:yep

    was there any other linear title that was fought at an agreed different weight recently ?:huh
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    31,397
    7,329
    Oct 5, 2009
    depends

    if its a compromise to make a big fight between 2 guys in diff weights then sure

    but i dont like title fights with them

    and i espceially hat the cotto one cause they are the same weight and its for the title
     
  3. goblin 2

    goblin 2 Blue Goblin Alliance Full Member

    2,032
    0
    Feb 21, 2010
    23 pacfans and counting lol
     
  4. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    The *****s were all for catchweight when Floyd wanted to fight JMM at a catchweight of 144 but when Floyd couldn't make the weight and had to change the contract and pay JMM $600,000...:think they're now against catchweight.

    :lol:
     
  5. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    what should be disgraceful is a rehydration clause like when Floyd wanted a rehydration clause against Winky.

     
  6. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,210
    5,428
    May 22, 2011
    Im not for catch weights or all these miscellaneous titles. It just ****s up the sport. Its turning it into a circus.:bbb:bbb:bbb