Ariza: Altitude training is counterproductive

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by retriever, Apr 23, 2011.


  1. DoubleM

    DoubleM Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,395
    371
    Nov 20, 2009
    At very high altitudes (>5000m), weight loss is unavoidable because your body actually consumes your muscles in order to provide energy. There is even a risk that the body’s immune system will become weakened, leading to an increased risk of infections, and there may be adverse changes in the chemical make-up of the muscles. Additionally, the body cannot exercise as intensely at altitude. This results in reduced training intensity, which can reduce performance.


    This is bull****. Altitude has nothing to do with losing muscle. Nutrition and your diet does. Calories in vs calories out.
     
  2. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    I can beleive everything except for the part about them adapting to the low altitude once they go in the ring. They may adjust to it, but they got a lot more tired in the higher altitude and they won't gas as quick in the lower, so it does help

    It's like saying training with a weighted vest for conditioning isn't a good idea because once you fight with no vest on there is no benefit because you adjusted to having ne vest on.
     
  3. wooootles

    wooootles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,944
    0
    Mar 2, 2011
    You have other things to worry about if you're training at the Himalayan peaks at 5000+ meters.
     
  4. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    I think altitude training is only good if you are gonna have your match at high altitude

    Ive seen this in other sports like Rugby, Some of the South africans teams come from the highveld...

    visiting teams always complain that it takes a bit of getting used to , but that same team who comes down to normal altitude for their games arent any fitter... Still losing to the Nz teams :good

    So I agree with Ariza here
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Absolute bull****. He makes it seem like living in the mountains (Which many people in the world do) is dangerous.

    Besides, Big Bear isn't greater than 5000m high. It's more like 5000 feet high (Not 16,000 feet high).
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    ya probably just bs , or really not all that significant in the end whatever the effects are.
     
  7. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    216
    Oct 24, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  8. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    14,002
    6,964
    Sep 5, 2010
    Your metabolism does rev up in higher altitudes so if you are'nt taking more calories then at lower altitudes, the metabolism will probably eat at a well trained athlete's muscles.
     
  9. Kid Cincinnati

    Kid Cincinnati GOOD BOY NATION Full Member

    5,636
    7
    Sep 9, 2010
    Manny Steward said Chavez used to train very high altitude. Even higher up than other Mexican boxers do.
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    mosley looks to be in awesome shape. ariza is on crack
     
  11. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Are you asking the TS? :think

    That's Ariza's theory . . . the TS simply posted it . . . so you are barking at the wrong tree. :deal
     
  12. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Mosley has BALCO on his side?
     
  13. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
  14. dcb154

    dcb154 Member Full Member

    269
    81
    Jul 24, 2008
    Guys, this is nothing but a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy (with this, therefore, because of this-implying that b/c there's a correlation, that it's the cause. You have to ignore the "outliers" like: age, diet, personal distractions, training method, competition, etc etc etc. You know, the stuff that doesn't matter).

    However, going off his reasoning, I've noticed that every fighter who has eaten broccoli in 1849 is now dead. Stay away from the broccoli!!
     
  15. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    shane's training doesn't seem as intense as pac's