Arthur - "I was robbed"

Well, I watched the fight, on my own and thought that Arthur lost quite badly. You appear to be in a minority of one in thinking that AAA won the fight as even Arthur has now conceded that he lost it.

 

Fair enough Dunk

 

He only conceded that he lost because of his Christian faith (lol THE most extraordinary piece of excuse making I've ever heard, congrats Dunky)

 

boycotted buying the ppv you mean. that does not mean we did not see the fight.

you've just picked up on one person saying they didn't see the fight and desperately clung to it.

i bet you've refused to watch the replay just in case it gives you second thoughts!

anyway, you are entitled to your opinion and i'm not disrespecting that. however, you seem to be disrespecting everyone elses opinion by claiming that they
1) are lying,
2) are easily led by sky commentators,
3) didn't see the fight and are just being anti-scottish,
4) can't possibly know cook won the fight because apparently no-one scores fights as they watch as it takes away from the spectacle (so how do you know arthur won? :think )

 

I had AAA winning it as did the guy beside me - however I have to admit I wasnt really focusing on the fight

 

Arthur looked liked he was wearing lead-lined shoes the whole fight ... very sluggish.

This is crazy talk from him, he's not doing himself any favours with this crap.

 

Now thats poor Rooq, calling yourself 'we'

Whats wrong Rookie scared incase you have to battle me all by yourself?
Dont worry, Im sure the unsilent majority have your back on this one, no need to call them out just yet, our argument hasnt sunk to those levels yet, has it?
Yup, I think most are lying. & are easily led by the commentators who had an agaenda, like they always do. Darke was his usual disgraceful self. Stupid football commentator that he is. & Im positive most didnt see the fight. we checked the live feeds just before the Arthur-Cook & it was pretty bare. Couldnt find one live feed.

as for your ramblings about scoring fights, Im talking about scoring them loosely. All this points **** that folk come out with on here like they are sitting on their chairs with their trousers round their ankles with their big Sharpie pens grasped in hand scoring the fight on the back of a large envelope, PLEASE!

Spare me the bull****. All of a sudden here everyone is a judge. We all watch a fight in our heads when its live & judge it on who we thought won the most rounds.
Now Im supposed to believe that we have a bunch of professional scorers on here, watching unbiasedly as the fight unfolds

My god, listen to yourself! I DONT BELIVE FOR A SECOND HERE THAT ANY FORUM HAS POSTERS THAT SCORE A FIGHT FAIRLY.

Fans just cant be trusted. & cos a bunch of posters come at me with their 'scores' Am I meant to sit back & say "Well I must admit, when the posters come back at me with their official scorecards, I must be wrong!!!"

What next? I have had posters telling me Cook won when they hadnt even seen the fight, & now ESB has its very own scoring officialsatsch

& people call me biased

 

No probs my genetically modified friend.

It just hurt me that you said I was mental, thats why I went a bit mental at your good self.
Cos Im not mental.

 

And I certainly would'nt want that.

I crossed the line and I apologise :good

 

But you do score fights meticulously and fairly huh?

Yet again, you imply that you are the only fair and just observer, but why the **** would I (or loads of others) actually care who wins? Cockney vs Scot, I couldn't care less.

YOU are the one with the blatant bias here.

If you scored for Arhur, good for you. The VAST majority didn't.

Is that due to a multitude of conspiracies - or (shock, horror) maybe you are wrong, and blinkered?

 

While I agree he lost the fight,its unjustifiable to have 3 English judges in a World Championship fight.The WBO (or whoever the title was) is a joke.English judges are as bad as Germany judges so how could they all be allowed to officiate.How exactly are they expected to be be objective and impartial,thats a joke.

Arthur was to blame as well,he should have protested about that long before the fight.

 

Give examples of corrupt English judging please or shut up. What you are saying holds no water, it's pure rubbish.

Were there not all English judges for Arthur-Foster which he won?

What's more you think he lost anyway so you are contradicting yourself - and you've not got an actual 'point' to make.

 

:rofl

I have an image of the ESB scoring panel at home. Trotter, onourgay and SleazeNation already with their pre-printed scorecards for Hatton-Malignaggi.

 

Stop kissing arse, it's pitiful to witness

 

atsch

I'm afraid the post was more entertaining than the dross humourless twats like you spew.

It really beggars belief people like you are on his back, the fountain of objectivity of course

What is it....10-9 Hatton, 10-9 Hatton, 10-9 Hatton, 10-7 Hatton, Malignaggi deducted points for failing to enter clinch, 10-9 Hatton atsch