Haye must put up or shut up http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/24112010/58/pugilist-haye-must-shut.html April 2010 - Adam Booth, David Hayes manager, just after Wladimir had claimed that Haye bitched out of fighting the Klitschkos and challenged him to fight: Vitali holds the WBC belt. The WBC and the WBA, as far as were concerned, are the two major titles, so Vitali holds the most significant belt in our eyes. November 2010 - Booth, with Wladimir tied up to fight Derek Chisora, and Vitali saying of a Haye fight, I am ready: I think David would love Wladimir because Wladimir called David a b-i-t-something. After the slaughter of sacrificial lamb Audley Harrison, all eyes turn once more to a potential showdown between David Haye and a Klitschko brother. Haye holds the WBA title, Vitali the WBC, and Wladimir the IBF and WBO; any unification bout would be the biggest heavyweight promotion since Lewis-Tyson in 2002. Up until now the Haye camp has blamed the Klitschkos sharp business practices for the failure to get the fight on, and with justification. Haye did sign to fight Wladimir for a bout which collapsed before its scheduled date of June 20th. last year. At that time, not yet a champion, Haye was to earn much less than 50%, the fight would be in Germany, and Haye was to give up options on his future fights to the brothers. Instead Haye beat Sugar Niko for the WBA belt and the picture changed. Thereafter the Klitschkos had to realise that Haye had become a huge money generator in his own right, and this, coupled with the WBA belt, earns him the right to a much higher percentage of the purse than their usual opponents. Last week, finally, Vitali Klitschko announced an offer which does recognise that Haye is entitled to better treatment. Vitali said, We have a great offer for him: we split the money, 50:50 worldwide no options, nothing. He added, I am ready to fight in Great Britain. On Sky Sports Ringside programme last week Adam Booth discussed the situation with the Klitschkos manager, Bernd Boente. Boente repeated Vitalis 50:50 offer but Booths reaction was less than enthusiastic. For Booth the sticking point was German TV revenue. The Klitschkos have a contract with the broadcaster RTL but there is no guarantee that they would be the highest bidder. It should be noted that pay-per-view has never been successfully established in Germany so there is much less money to be had than in the UK or the US. In response to Booths concerns, Boente went as far as suggesting that if Booth could get a rival German broadcaster to offer more than RTL, the Klitschkos would pay 50% of the extra money to Haye so that they could stay with their preferred broadcaster. After all, Boente said, that sum was unlikely to be more than 500,000 (£430,000), a paltry amount in the context of a mega-fight. On hearing that answer Booth changed the subject. In truth, German TV revenue is irrelevant. Haye will generate more money in the UK than the Klitschkos do in Germany because of the PPV situation but, worldwide - including the US, the biggest market of all - the brothers are much better known. It would be ridiculous to analyse every market and attempt to decipher which fighter brings more revenue - if Booth wants to do that the fight will never happen. Ultimately both sides need the other to create a mega-fight. Vitali said of the deal on the table - its a fair offer hes right, and that is what really matters. Two weeks ago I said that the brothers must make Haye an offer he cant refuse. If Haye does not believe that he can beat Vitali then the offer from Vitali is most certainly one that he can refuse. If Haye believes he will lose to Vitali then, in the long run, provided the British public keeps buying his fights, and one fears they will, Haye will earn more by continuing to fight lesser opponents, putting off a day of reckoning for as long as possible. On Ringside, Booth tried to claim that Haye would be forced to fight WBA mandatory challenger Ruslan Chagaev next but he folded under pressure from Boente. Boente said, regarding the mandatories, thats not really a problem because there is not one governing body who would not agree to put that fight [Haye-Vitali] together. Booth then admitted, Yeah, I agree. Perhaps the most instructive remarks from the discussion were Booth describing the negotiation as a nightmare, and Boente calling it very simple and easy. Being offered a 50:50 purse split, with no options, and at whichever location generates the most money makes it very simple if Haye wants to fight a Klitschko; its only a nightmare for him if he doesnt. Lets be clear: if Haye wants to avoid a fight with the Klitschkos, thats absolutely fine. Haye has the right to maximise his income; he is in a very dangerous profession and he owes it to his family to make as much money as safely as he can. However, there is one important way in which Haye cannot refuse this offer. He cannot refuse this offer and call himself a champion. Indeed, given the way Haye calls himself heavyweight champion of the world, without correction from the UK media, you could be forgiven for failing to realise that there are two more fighters out there making the same claim, and with greater justification. After his retirement, hoping others would follow his exalted example, Muhammad Ali asked future champions not to duck the top contenders but to fight the best and thus to embody those connotations of that word, champion, which go beyond mere sporting prowess. Quite simply you cannot call yourself heavyweight champion if there are legitimate, rival claimants offering you a fair, 50:50 deal to compete in the richest prizefight of your life - and you refuse. Vitali believes Haye is smart enough to understand [that] he's world champion so long as he doesn't fight against the Klitschkos, and calls him champion by talking. If David Haye wants to continue to call himself champion, the time for talking is over. James Garner / Eurosport
you still have to see where Haye is coming from. if he generates more money than the Klitsckos he should get the bigger slice, I don't see how anyone can argue with that from a business stand point. ass a fan i say "back up your words and take the fight 50-50" but the Klitsckos need to answer the same questions. If they really wan't Haye they should be prepared to give away the UK money.
I dont know. its 50/50 both sides they are both HW champs, but Hayes resume is laughable compared to the Klits, and Klits have been HW champ much longer. Haye should just take the fight and split 50/50 down the middle. will he do that is another thing. G
The problem is that that is almost impossible to prove who generates more cash, e.g. How many people buying UK PPV will be paying to watch Haye, how many to watch Haye fight a Klitschko? How many people in Germany will be watching to see Klitschko, how many to see Klitschko fight Haye? Etc, etc. worldwide. And it depends a lot on whether or not the fight sells in the US where hardly anyone has even heard of David Haye yet. It's way too complex to try to pin everything down. 50:50 is fair, isn't it? Champion against champion. You could argue Haye is lucky to get that seeing as Wlad beat the WBA champ Ruslan Chagaev but somehow never got his belt.
Although I agree he should take 50-50 you must see the logic. If you Hayes accountant and not a boxing fan, what will you advise him?? Hayes record is not laughable compared to the Klitskcos. Haye was undisputed champion at Cruiserweight, beat the lineal Champion. Have either Klitscko ever beat a lineal champ or unified a division??
Thats fair enuf, but it is laughable mate, and his HW resume is not the best either, It just frustrates me that he wont just crack on and sign on the dotted line. he should just sign with vitali 50/50 down the middle and get it on. i understand he wants to make as much money as possible, which if i was in his position i would feel the same, but he has got deadlines he wants to retire next year and hes pretty certain he is going to stick to that, he has nowhere else to go and he talks aout legacy and **** if he wants to achieve near an ATG status then he got to get in the ring with 1 Klit if not 2. Its unlike me to down talk Haye as i have always stuck up for him,(look at my other threads/posts about Haye) but it does genuinley look like he is ducking them, 1 min they want to fight Wlad then Vitali then it changes again then Vitali comes with an offer and they saying they want Wlad again, they both HW champs split it even and if he beats Vitali which im sure he will, he can then make demands but until then just fight and dont be greedy! G
Its impossible for us but its not impossible for the teams to work it out. They know how much Haye made from his fights with Ruiz and Audley in PPV. They know how much Wlad made from German TV. They no how much each made from the rest of europe, asia and the ROTW. HBO have categoricly said they will buy a Haye vs Klitscko fight, but will not buy a fight between either and another opponent (apart from Adameck). If the amount of money generated from all worldwide TV revenue is 60% in Hayes favour, he should get a 60% cut. You can get an indication of how many people in Germany are watching to see Haye and how many are watching to see Klitskco. Wlad got 12million watching his last fight, Haye got 4million for the Audley fight. 1/4 to Haye its simple. Haye vs Harrison for 750k on Sky Box Office. How many buys did Klitscko vs Chambers get on Primetime? We know that the Klitsckos can get 40,000 in a stadium, but more people doesn't always mean more money due to the large costs involved in putting on a stadium fight. Remember Klitscko vs Haye sold 60,000 tickets in 1 day in 2009, and before that the Klitsckos had never been in an arena bigger than 25,000. At the end of the day if David Haye can say he made an average of £10million from his last two fight, and the Brothers only made £7million, Haye should get the lions share. If its the other way round the Klitsckos should get the lions share. It doesn't matter about ring titles, having 2 belts or who called who out first. Whoever generates more money, should take the bigger purse, end of story.
I don't think you can laugh of his Heavyweight resume. He won a title in 2 fights. Thats pretty impressive no matter who the champion is and how bad the fight was. Its unlike me to back up Haye. But you can't cast the Klitsckos as inocent bystanders who will do anything in there power to take the fight. All 3 fighters are now business men first and boxers 2nd. Surley it would be crazy for Vitali Klitscko to demand a 50-50 purse from a fighter that generates more money than him?
If the Klitschko deal is so terrible for Haye why doesn't he fight Chagaev? That fight will do how much in PPV? 350k? 400k? Thats 400k x 5 quid from Sky = 2 million pounds for Haye. Then a 12-14k gate makes Haye another 1 million quid. So that's 3 million for Haye. Out of that he has to pay Chagaev his mandatory 25% share and he has to pay a nice fat cut to Sauerland thanks to the slave contract. Oh yea Haye is such a money machine and such a genius business man
Barrett Valuev Ruiz Harrison wtf? Im not saying the Klits are inocent mate, but they have dished out the contracts and Haye and his team are changing their minds all the time.. are they not? (dont make me scroll through the net and find articles to evidence this) infact there are probs posts on here already. I would not consider it to be crazy, its jut another excuse to not fight them. but then again we will never know the FACTS bcoz Haye team saying one thing and Klit team saying another. G
What would Chagaev do for him though if he plans to retire next October? although Chagaev would probs be the best name on his HW resume to date i cant see it doing much, unless he uses it as a warm up fight for a klit bro later next year then retires... i dont know, bottom line is to get in thr ring with the Klits and prove he can beat them and unify the divison, without doing this he cant be what he says he is going to be! G
Big Dunk: Also consider that if Haye believes he can beat a Klitschko then this is a massive opportunity for him to break the US market. Ask Ricky Hatton if that is good for your bank balance or not.
Were the people Holyfield faced in his first 5 Heavyweight fights much better?? Bonin - For a Heavyweight debut was good, and he dispatched him in 1 round. Barrett - For a full Heavyweight debut again very good. Was a top 15 Heavyweight at the time, coming off a win. Exciting fight and Haye was impressive. Valuev - A World Champion. Perhaps a poor one but a top 5 Heavyweight and a difficult fight for anyone especially a small HW like Haye. Ruiz - Mandatory. Was still a top 10 Heavyweight. Harrison - Cannot defend. A disgrace. But if Audley was called Arnold Harneman, a German Olympic Champion with the exact same record, and the Klitscko's could make huge money fighting him? Do you really think they wouldnt??? And lets be real. Sosnowski, also won a vacant European title and got his shot. Shannon Briggs??? Do I need to go through the Klitsckos records and point our all the **** fighters they have faced in the last 3 years?? I don't think either side are saying different things now. Just arguing why either man is right. Booth has said Haye generates more revenue than a Klitskco based on the figures he was given in negotiations last year. K2 have never denied this, and have said that the UK money far out ways the german TV money. They are the biggest earners for either man, followed by HBO in the US who will only buy this fight, not either man agaisnt another opponent. As I have said, as a fan I say "Hayes being a *****" but to think the Klitsckos are bending over backwards to make the fight would be nieve.
I agree, but remember Haye plans to retire in October. If his next two fights are the Klitsckos, they will be in Europe. So no big US fight.