Article on Tyson vs. todays top heavyweights

I wouldn't call someone crazy for thinking either could win; I think intelligent arguments could be made for either winning, even if they were "wrong".

 

But he did knockout a Ruddock in 2 rounds after Tyson went life and death with him the year before.

 

Life and death?

That's a little overstated...

 

There's no doubt Tyson failed to put away guys who, if they never fought, would be considered KO victims for sure...

That's boxing; Lewis' power is a bit underrated anyway. He timed Ruddock and taught him a lesson for trying to jab to the body...

 

How is it? Ruddock had Tyson hurt numerous times, he sure as hell finished stronger and was dominating Mike at the end. Fair enough Tyson busted him up too, but if the fight was 15 rounds I think the result could have been different.

 

Holmes proved Ali was his inferior.

Marciano proved Louis was his inferior.

You see now?

Please try again.

 

....So Foreman's results vs Frazier and Norton vs Ali's results vs Frazier and Norton prove Foreman was Ali's inferior?

Dang I learn something new every day!

 

Merchant's ghost is as drunk as the original version of Merchant....

 

Am I hearing you correctly!?:nut

 

Both Klitschkos!?. And hows that!?:huh

 

At that time they did..A waaaaaaay past there primes Ali and Louis ya, but in there prime you know things would have been much different with the exception of Tyson and Holmes....maybe!

 

Southpaw needs to stfu unless he produces some answers to my questions... Hes effectively disqualified himself from any conversation regarding these fighters until then...

Predictably, he's ignoring them.

 

No way..You really think these 2 idiots would get away with huggin and grabbin on a prime Tyson??..I think not my man. They are both in way over there heads, speed and relentlessness would have them both outa there pretty fast..PERIOD!

 

What was the question Ahole?/:bart

 

Go read son. Read the thread you're blindly posting in.... atsch