Arum considering 4-man tournament for pacquiao

arum was offering a jmm-peterson and bradley-pac match up. you guys complain when pac-cotto was brought up. so which other set of opponents should pac take aside from floyd who has no interest in negotiating for a fair split?

 

you would not believe pac and yet you believe floyd who is more of a proven liar.

it's just simple really. floyd agrees to a fair 50/50 split and the ball is in arum and pac's court. so why can't floyd agree instead and you guys would not have to make excuses for him always?

 

Give it a rest.Haven't you guys had enough of this garbage slinging?:tired

 

They're going to have a tournament for Pacquiao at welterweight where none of the participants are actual welterweights.

 

All of these fights seem entertaining, but having them in a tournament style just seems like a way for Arum to keep making money and keep Pacquiao busy regardless of a possible Floyd fight.

 

Bad idea, if so. Floyd's style ages MUCH better than Pacquiao's style.

 

shut the **** up, why do you never consider any fault on the other side of the argument?

 

agreed.
i usally quit reading anything after i hear the word "arum"

 

x2

 

It would be much more interesting if the Berto/Ortiz winner was included in the "tournament" somehow. Keep Pacman/Bradley and match the Berto/Ortiz winner against Marquez...then , obviously, the winners face each other.

 

I don't believe **** Arum says anymore... He just talking out of his ass.

 

I hopr yall see its been Pac vs Bradley June 9 from day 1! Then tried to get Cotto so he couldnt fight Floyd but Cotto said **** off at 147!!!!! So its back to Bradley and thats locked in. watch what I tell you!

 

The ship you're on is sinking faster than you can type.

 

This is crazy. And people are actually buying it, excited. So now we're not even trying to make a Mayweather fight in the future?

 

:deal ITS CALLED THE PACTANTIC......