Arum: Marquez-Bradley, Pacquiao-Cotto II is 'logical'

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Florez, Aug 29, 2012.


Page 1 of 5
  1. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    "Manny will make a decision by the end of the week," said Arum. "And then, we'll go from there."

     
    Florez, Aug 29, 2012
    Florez, Aug 29, 2012
    #1
  2. raichu

    raichu Guest

    if pac cotto is at 154, then we got a fight, if Manny disfigured his face again, and makes him a bloody mess again, i would be impressed.
     
    raichu, Aug 29, 2012
    raichu, Aug 29, 2012
    #2
  3. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    im thinking cotto. marquez is a tough nut to crack. bradley cant bring in cash. cotto is the logical choice between the 3
     
    Boxing Fanatic, Aug 29, 2012
    Boxing Fanatic, Aug 29, 2012
    #3
  4. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Pacquiao should fight Cotto @ 154 and weigh in at his comfortable weight, If Pacquiao beats Cotto in spectacualr fashion @ 154, That would make the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight more interesting.
     
    Florez, Aug 29, 2012
    Florez, Aug 29, 2012
    #4
  5. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Sweet! I hope this happens.
    Bradley Vs. Marquez> PAC Vs. Marquez IV
     
    Hatesrats, Aug 29, 2012
    Hatesrats, Aug 29, 2012
    #5
  6. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Completely logical for Pacquiao to fight the guy he beat most decisively again while the guy who beat him on the vast majority of unofficial cards and the guy who beat him on the official cards have to fight each other to get another shot.
     
    purephase, Aug 29, 2012
    purephase, Aug 29, 2012
    #6
  7. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Hell No.. Cotto is the worse choice..
     
    renyo, Aug 29, 2012
    renyo, Aug 29, 2012
    #7
  8. Clarky Cat

    Clarky Cat Stalwart Full Member

    2,279
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    **** Arum. That's logical.
     
    Clarky Cat, Aug 29, 2012
    Clarky Cat, Aug 29, 2012
    #8
  9. boxingboy

    boxingboy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,767
    0
    Sep 30, 2010
    I'm sick of this bull****
     
    boxingboy, Aug 29, 2012
    boxingboy, Aug 29, 2012
    #9
  10. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    :rofl

    Then what? Pacquiao-Cotto winner against Marquez-Bradley? :lol:

    Meanwhile, Mayweather-Alexander. :lol:
     
    Asterion, Aug 29, 2012
    Asterion, Aug 29, 2012
    #10
  11. yingyang

    yingyang Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    0
    Sep 21, 2010
    The Catchweight King strikes again... Pac and his BS catchweight.
     
    yingyang, Aug 29, 2012
    yingyang, Aug 29, 2012
    #11
  12. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    pac is only weighing in at 144, 148 on fight night.

    i don't think he's fighting above 147 anytime soon.
     
    dodong, Aug 29, 2012
    dodong, Aug 29, 2012
    #12
  13. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Then Cotto should not even be considered. Anything below 154 will be criticized and rightfully so.
     
    PBFred, Aug 29, 2012
    PBFred, Aug 29, 2012
    #13
  14. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    :-(
     
    Bogotazo, Aug 29, 2012
    Bogotazo, Aug 29, 2012
    #14
  15. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011
    bogo, who do you want floyd to fight this year, realistically? If he fights this year that is :yep
     
    Hook!, Aug 29, 2012
    Hook!, Aug 29, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 5