I don't see why it can't happen if Brook gets rid of Sanavia relatively early. He can fight for the title two years after he was first offered it
Well Frank said he offered Brook a title shot 2 years ago and as it is Frank I assumed it would have been the WBO. I take your point though.
Frank once came out and said the WBO should strip Pacquiao because he was holding up Kell's career :nut So instead of trying to move his fighter he stuck him in with guys like Philip Kotey, who was nearly belted into next week by the first range finder of a jab from Brook. I'd go the long route here, beat this guy and then go for the winner of the IBF. Bradders will be looking at the Pac/Marquez winner, belt or not.
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/matchroom-turned-down-timothy-bradley-fight-kell-brook Was offered in August, turned down by Brook. Would rather be IBF mando.
hearn on twitter has said the offer wasn't a very good one. He is guarenteed to fight the winner of Alexander vs Bailey next. If you mapping out his career. Salvida in October in Sheffield Alexander in February in the US/Sheffield Hatton in July at the Etihad.
This will be a good test of what Eddie is all about. The IBF mandatory route is the avenue they look to be going down. Id like to see what would happen if Arum offers him the fight.