Arum PBF-Pac not in our plans"

Oh ****, Oscar is a senior citizen isn't he?

****, he went from 35 to 36 I think. Mother ****er needs a wheelchair.

 

jokes aside, you do agree with my post:hi:

 

Pac got his just as much as Floyd got hit.

 

Capsfund Capsfund what ever will we do without you.


Oscar was fighting at 154 against Floyd when he was 34 and 3 months.


Oscar against Pac was 147 if any higher? And he was 35 and 10 months.


Oscar was a year and half older.

Quite a big difference, specially when cutting weight and not gaining of it back.

 

thats not how floyd rolls, he is a defensive minded fighter. He would rather display his beautiful boxing ability for 12 rounds to be appreciated by boxing purist:good

 

It is not about who is better skilled, that isnt the statement I made, so stop putting spin on it Pimp,.

I am going to tell you this very slow so you understand,

Ricky Hatton who holds hits and headbutts is considerd cheating correct?

So what is Hopkins holding and hitting and headbutting called? you all call it skill, so the problem ricky faces is that as far as you are all concerend he is a dirty fighter, But replace the name with Hopkins and you will argue its skill.

 

But Pac didn't get hit either.

Isn't that boxing ability?

 

Floyd could have done what Pacquiao did, he wasnt defensive when he foguht Gatti was he? No, and had he came into the fight like that Floyd would have gotten all of the respect that Manny has got in doing what Manny did.

 

again you are comparing 2 different DLH:hi:

pac didn't get hit because DLH the weight drained wasn't punching that much compared to the DLH who fought floyd who would still kick ass

 

Kind of easier when your opponent is weight drained and you weigh MORE than them.

 

its not about Versatility its about keeping it ****ing real Pimp~ Hatton gets bashed for his style while those same people who bash Ricky praise Hopkins for his cheating tactics and call it skill its pathetic, whats worse is your that kind of person, and what you do is add spin to it by following up with some **** that has nothing to do with the facts being discussed, you address what I am saying then go on with your smoke screne, with your follow up statements.
Hopkins shown more versatility, who gives a **** that isnt what I am talking about, but its sure what you would rather me focus on other than the facts.