Arum Says Pac-Clottey Will Have NO Catchweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Fanatic, Jan 10, 2010.


  1. littlefloyd

    littlefloyd Pure boxer Full Member

    2,232
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    or he could be rip and roided at 154 like your hero:good
     
  2. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    you dont know much about roids do you?

    its ok i understad you're a trailer trash with no education.
     
  3. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    My take is that 147 for Oscar was some sort of middle ground. Pac going up from 135 and Oscar from 154.

    For Cotto I think they were playing it safe as they weren't 100% sure how Pac would fare against a real welter. The Cotto fight proved that he still looked great against a welterweight so I'm guessing they're more confident in Pac now, hence no need for a catchweight.
     
  4. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    and what does that say of your idol floydie who fought a real super featherweight in marquez at 144, er.. 146lbs?:lol:
     
  5. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    Arum says a lot of things which turn out to be more false than anything...**** him and his words.
     
  6. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    Clottey tends to fade away in the later rounds anyway so "weightdraining" him is pointless... :D
     
  7. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    Why did Pacquaio not allow to carry that extra pound?