**As a boxer: slow w/ power or swift/ no power....**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Orishaman, Dec 4, 2014.


  1. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    As a boxer, would you prefer to be slow with power, or swift with skills but no power....?
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    as a fighter and as a man, the first thing you want is power.
     
  3. TJ Max

    TJ Max Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,300
    345
    Jun 2, 2013
    Slow with power. You can work on timing. GGG isn't the fastest guy around, but he'll put you to sleep.

    If you completely lack power, you get in there with a guy with the right style and plenty of heart, he's going to give you a beating of a lifetime, even if you win.

    Every time you fight a guy like that, it's going to be life and death.

    The opposing fighter is not going to be afraid to take risks and counter your punches, even if they get hit in return. It's a bad situation to be in.

    If you're too slow, yes, there is definitely a possibility that a defensive boxer could beat you, and perhaps even a guy with no power could win on points, but that all depends on styles.

    Just because you're slow of hand and foot, doesn't mean you don't have the style necessary to beat a boxer. You have to throw a lot of punches and walk them down. Vary the power because you can.

    Plus if you have power and you meet a guy with a lot of heart that keeps coming forward, you can put them to sleep Foreman vs Frazier style.
     
  4. TJ Max

    TJ Max Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,300
    345
    Jun 2, 2013
    That's why I don't understand people wanting to put Crawford in with Provo, who is actually not all that slow, especially when he has you against the ropes. Those combinations flow.

    But Crawford's power is a question mark, especially at 140. If it turns out Crawford really is an arm puncher, he may beat Provo, but he's going to take one hell of a beating to do it.

    But maybe a guy that can really punch, like Keith Thurman, maybe, might be able to control Provo relatively easily and even put him to sleep.

    Styles make fights.
     
  5. ejdge

    ejdge Member Full Member

    322
    0
    Jan 31, 2007
    So true. Let Crawford take a tune up fight. He's taken some hard fights and deserves to test out the waters at 140 before jumping in with sharks.

    Sometimes all it takes is one fight to lose your momentum and cripple you mentally (Bute).
     
  6. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    hamed
     
  7. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,344
    7,919
    Sep 2, 2011
    Probably power.
     
  8. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,168
    27,888
    Jan 18, 2010
    Slow with power.

    Ego wise, and because I'm not from one of the big boxing countries, so I can never rely on th judges if it goes the distance.
     
  9. Orishaman

    Orishaman I tell it like it is.... Full Member

    5,582
    0
    Aug 5, 2004
    As a former boxer, like many of us, we understand and know that power is not acquired either you have heavy hands or you don't. True you can improve on technique with footwork, rotation, excercise to 'improve' your accuracy and connecting impact....power gets you respect inside the ropes, power causes for your opponent to change strategies, power will make your opponent think about commuting to the infighting regardless if your are slow or not....

    Who can forget when Mayorga KO Vernon Forest, and won the rematch....

    Skill and swiftness can only take you so far, unless your skills are simply unmatch ....Willie Pep, Nico Loche , and Sweat Pea are the RARE FEW in history that were incredible technicians above their contemporaries!!

    You can teach technique to a slow powerful boxer, but you can 't teach power!!
     
  10. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    Slick goes far in the sport, sport with power certainly doesn't.
     
  11. TJ Max

    TJ Max Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,300
    345
    Jun 2, 2013
    I don't know if I agree with that. Power gets you viewers.

    At the end of the day, people want at the very least, a chance of a KO.

    Believe me, if Mayweather was featherfisted, he would have gotten his ass beat a long time ago unless he had the cherry picking strategy of a lifetime.

    I will say, Mayweather may not be featherfisted, but he doubted his ability to keep Margarito off him.
     
  12. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Slow with power. Even if you're slow, you'd still always have a puncher's chance.

    All it takes is one punch in boxing.
     
  13. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    It has nothing at all to do with Floyds power or lack of.... or his chin .

    Its his reflexes and his excellent shoulder roll defense that has protected him from getting stopped .
     
  14. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Slow with power .

    No matter how bad im behind on the scorecards , Theres will always be a very high chance I can quickly erase the judges scorecards and send their asses home with a single haymaker on my opponent .
     
  15. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012
    I'll take lightening speed and slightly less pop, although I'd want enough to stop dudes if landed clean enough. Big power but no chance of landing anything is of limited use.