As of now: Crawford or Lomachenko higher pound for pound?

My list is
*GGG(out of respect till he retires)
1)Bud(Cleared out 2 divisions in dominant fashion, moving on up to the 3rd)
2)Loma(Resume is better than Bud's, was his performances, I don't think so. Not after Salido)
3)Rigo( I think he could still dominate 126lbs if he really wanted it)

 

I don't know. Tough, tough, tough question right now. Loma has looked great. He is racking up a resume of good and very good fighters. Russel Jr., Walters, Rigo (even if small/old), etc.

Crawford though I believe has fewer holes in his game. Due to him having power, I don't think he's as vulnerable to being walked down as Loma is.

 

Never seen Crawford, but i'd put my house on him being levels below Hi Tech Matrix No Mas Chenko

GGG #1
Loma #2

GGG's fighting the best prime roided to the gills fighters available. On a level playing field both Canelo and Jacobs would have been flattened

 

This content is protected

 

1. Loma
2. Crawford

 

I find it hard to separate them tbh.

 

I have rigo out of my top 10 list.

 

I like undisputed.

 

Yeah both are great. I have Loma higher though. I had Rigo rated high in my rankings and Loma beat him so he goes to #1.

 

That's fair logic.
I think p4p is about skills and i think loma is more skilled than any fighter on the planet.

But resume does also count and Crawford has done a little more in terms of being undisputed and all

But he doesn't have a name like rigo on his resume its a tough one

 

The **** are you doing here right now? Do you like boxing or don't you? Go watch you some Bud my dude. Even if you don't think he's better than Nomas he's way too good to sleep on.

 

Fans demanded the fight, he give them their wish, got in their with an oversized, dazzling skilled fighter and decided it was a bad idea. He was going to lose via UD, or KO, he knew it. No shame in quitting, As Kirk mentioned the other day, Duran once quit, never hurt his legacy, as this shoulnd't hurt Rigo's.