I scored the fight 115-113 for Pac-man with about 4 of the rounds very close(close enough that you could have scored them either way) Super close fight with both guys doing alot of good work. and As Per Usual with East Side Boxing:everyone screams robbery:roll: you guys are like this after every big fight that goes the way you said it wouldnt. even name calling at the posters who scored it closely for the guy who you think diddnt win the fight. Every time after a big fight when I'm on here I feel like I'm standing in the middle of a room full of 3rd graders.....GROW UP!IT WAS A CLOSE FIGHT!
I agree with your post 100%, and had the fight scored the exact same way. The whining is unfortunately way too predictable.
Sad part is that I expected these from the idiots but Im see level headed posters get swayed by this. The judges scored the fight the way they scored it.. Maybe you think you're better but I'll tell you something..maybe the perspective of being at ringside to hear, see the punches up close has something to do with their decision?
doesnt matter how any of us scored it. what matters is the fight was stolen from JMM in the 12th round by the ****** judge that gave the round to PAC somehow when it was clearly all JMM.
Yeah but that wouldnt have change the fight as everyone claerly stated he would have had it 114-113 PAC.. Are you ok? youre getting to involved in this
It is actually a fact that sitting right at the ringside gives you worse view than that at home. When sitting at ringside, and I know this... you have way too many spots in the fight were the fighters are on the other side of the ring, with one of their backs facing you... they are punching and you can't tell who is landing what. I think that is a very poor viewpoint. Maybe nice to hear punches... but since when did the sound of punches matter so much? I can slap my hand and make it sound lounder than a thudding uppercut. If it doesn't cause serious harm, or a knockdown it really doesn't matter if it was more louder. I have always believed that Judges need to be sitting above the ring, in somewhat of a tennis judge type seating. The overhead view would give them a much more accurate perception of the fight.
Its just sad really. I thought it was a very close fight which couldve gone either way. But I guess alot of posters just couldnt accept Pac winning. So they call it a robbery.. Very very sad..
Paq won 115-113, JMM was hurt more than Manny, dropped on his ass, outlanded, busted up, and Manny was the agressor and pressed the action,,.. YOU guy's that "THINK" JMM won are a bunch of whiners that probaly lost $$$ get over it and learn how to bet...atsch
sorry dumbass. your boy kissed the canvass. that made the difference. get over it. we own your ass again :good
no robbery here, just a close fight. I scored it for Marquez, but there were about 3 very close rounds that could've gone to both fighters.
I agree that "robbery" is shouted from the goatshanty's after every single decision on ESB, but I have to say. They had some credence to their arguments (by the way what does taht e mean?) because It was kindof where yuo see it. If all how you svcore fights is on the aggressor regardless of landed shots or effectiveness allthewhike they are getting outboxed that is fine that's your perogative. But that's the thing, every one is either an ignorant action fool or somegayass hugger or just some know it all who spooges over any boxer. But that's just hpw my cookie crumbels. PS. Manny, shave that ****ign rat That is all.