At 154 Terrible Terry Norris would have opened up a can of whoop ass on Shane Mosley

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FINITO, Mar 7, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Naw, i kiss ur mom with this mouth *****.
     
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    #31
  2. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Laugh @ these foos who are trying to label Mosley as a " Lightweight ".... rofl I mean when was the last time he fought there and who did he fight exactly at 135? nobody... Mosley made his mark as a welterweight and wasn't that bad at 154 so dont make it sound like this is some mismatch... U foos are real boxing fans?? lol

    Ummm FYI Norris isn't that much bigger than mosley...

    U ****ers make it seem like this some Pac VS Hoya or some**** but it's not.. Pure ignorance.
     
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    #32
  3. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    yeah we're all idiots, you're the only smart one :)
     
    bernie4366, Mar 7, 2009
    bernie4366, Mar 7, 2009
    #33
  4. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Naw there are many knowledgable posters in here but you're not one of them.. I know that. There are many boxing historians in the classic forum with much more knowledge than me.. Im not tripping.
     
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    FINITO, Mar 7, 2009
    #34
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    False. Shane was not Meldrick. Shane was strong at 154 compared to Meldrick, who was too small for Terry. My pick is Shane to stop Norris.
     
    MAG1965, Mar 7, 2009
    MAG1965, Mar 7, 2009
    #35
Page 3 of 3