At What Point Did Belts Become A Joke?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by evalistinho, Sep 27, 2011.


  1. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Obviously it meant something in the older days but sanctioning bodies are pathetic nowadays. When was the turning point? And why?
     
  2. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    90's I think, it still meant something during haglers reign but it is nothing now, so somehwere in the 90's they messed up.
     
  3. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    When sanctioning bodies stopped caring about the sport and just wanting money. They have so many ****ing belts now that it is pathetic. Some sanctioning bodies even make it hard for their champion to unify the titles.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'd say the 90s is when it really started to get bad, and then the 00s it reached a new level.

    Boxing had two major titles from the 1920s to the 1980s, but usually there was just one guy with the two titles anyway (especially during the first half of the century).

    Then the IBF and WBO arrived in the 80s, and it has just gotten ridiculous.

    Super champ, diamond belt, regular champ, WTF?
     
  5. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    the worst thing is that the wbc and wba are actually the worst sanctioning bodies at the moment.
     
  6. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    If im not mistaken i imagine it was the WBA and WBC. Kind of made unification bouts mean something as well.

    EDIT: Of course it was you said so how come i didnt see that.
     
  7. gob-bluth

    gob-bluth Member Full Member

    238
    0
    Jul 16, 2011
    as soon as there was more than one champion at the weigh. simple
     
  8. bballchamp11

    bballchamp11 Poster of the Year Full Member

    2,378
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    When the WBC issued their 154 championship to a 150 bout with two nobodies in the 154 weight division
     
  9. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    im pretty sure it was before Pacquiao vs Margarito. :D
     
  10. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    After the Walker Law in the 1920s, it was the NBA and NYSAC. In the 1960s, the NBA became the WBA and NYSAC supported the WBC.

    Either one or two champs in a division sounds really nice right now.
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Not when you've only been into boxing for a couple years, like Bballchump11 has...
     
  12. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Ever since 1995 when Robbie Regan fought Ferid Ben Jeddou for the IBF interim Flyweight title, slowly they've become more and more meaningless since then.
     
  13. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Keep it at one belt per division would be the best thing to do IMO.
     
  14. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    When they went from 8 weight classes to 17 !
     
  15. bballchamp11

    bballchamp11 Poster of the Year Full Member

    2,378
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    you don't even watch boxing that's why you're a fan of no fighter

    you're so useless you couldn't even make snow melt