At what point did heavyweight "giants" learn to punch with correct technique?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, Jun 7, 2017.


When?

  1. 1920s-1930s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 1940s-1950s

    4.5%
  3. 1960s-1970s

    9.1%
  4. 1980s-1990s

    50.0%
  5. 2000s-2010s

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. They always have

    31.8%
  7. They never have

    4.5%
  1. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,377
    26,627
    Jun 26, 2009
    What you're not grasping is that there are variations and that doesn't make them incorrect.

    I ask again -- is George Foreman's jab the same as Muhammad Ali's?

    Your basic Foreman "shotgun/poleaxe" jab is thrown moving straight ahead and stepping into the punch (which you earlier cited as the correct technique).

    But Ali often throws his from the side and moving laterally or away from the opponent. NOT stepping into the punch. Same with Larry Holmes.

    Now Holmes and Riddick Bowe were schooled by Eddie Futch. Surely we can agree that Futch knew how to teach the most basic punch of all. And you will find that both often, quite effectively and with great snap and power, plant the left foot (rather than stepping into it) and push off of the back (right) foot and lean forward when throwing.

    You can see those and others here:
    This content is protected


    So no, they are not the same. By your reasoning, only one of those can be correct if others use the jab differently. I'm saying they are all effective thus all correct. There's not just ONE way to throw a jab.
     
    populistpugilist likes this.
  2. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Tyson is leaned to the right because he just threw a right to the body. He didn't lean over any more than he already was. Same with Bowe. They have the same basic power generation and follow through technique.

    100% no difference.
     
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I'm not talking variations. I'm talking basic ****ing boxing fundamentals. Why is that so hard for you to get? A jab has little to no hip activation whatsoever and primarily comes from the shoulder. I don't care what you call it a spear jab, up jab, whatever. They are all generated exactly the same from Ali to Tyson. A jab is a jab.

    Go into ANY real boxing gym and tell the trainer there is no such universally accepted basic technique for the jab or uppercut. It will not be a conversation that goes in your favor.
     
  4. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,377
    26,627
    Jun 26, 2009
    I trained boxers, amateurs and pros, for about 8-10 years. I've spent more hours in gyms than I can count. I've talked boxing with many noted trainers -- people who trained Olympians and world champions.

    You keep backtracking -- first it's "there's only one way to throw each punch" and say the jab involves stepping forward into it ... and I show you that it can be thrown other ways correctly and you then backtrack to the definition ... but if there's only one way to throw it, then we're talking technique, not definition.

    I've had world-class trainers show me variations of the jab -- shotgun, up-jab, etc. They are thrown differently. What you do with your arm is different. Weight distribution is different. So there is NOT one correct way to throw each punch, there are numbers of correct ways to throw each one.

    Again, if your fallback is "a jab is an extension of the lead hand" and "a straight right is the right hand thrown ... um, straight" -- that's definition, not how to throw it.

    If you can throw an uppercut leaning to the right as Tyson did in your gif, using shoulder and torso rotation to generate power ... and you can also throw it straight up the middle with no shoulder rotation and instead bend the knees and just drive them upward (straighting up, pushing off the canvas) -- that is TWO DIFFERENT WAYS to throw an uppercut. No way you can argue differently. So tell me, is one of those ways incorrect?
     
  5. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Then what I am saying should be crystal clear to you. You're arguing against a position that I am not arguing for.

    How about this. If you want to continue this debate then reread my posts and figure out my position. After that make an appropriate response to whatever you find objectionable and we can go from there.
     
  6. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,377
    26,627
    Jun 26, 2009
    I've spelled out several examples of various punches that can be thrown more than one way. I've showed you deviations (variations) of jab, uppercut and left hook. Tons of different ways to throw the right hand (straight right vs overhand vs cross, for example).

    So I completely disagree with your thesis.

    I got an idea. Go to a boxing gym, find the head trainer, and tell him there's only one way to throw a jab. Demonstrate that way to him. Challenge him to show you a different way to throw it.

    (To repeat an example, Ali can throw it moving laterally, NOT stepping into the punch, from the side; Foreman most often throws it straight (not to his left side, but in front of him) while stepping into the punch. NOW TELL ME that those are the same way of throwing it.

    And this is pointless. You've basically conceded my position that there are "deviations" of how to throw punches and backtracked on the "there's only ONE WAY to throw each punch and all other ways are incorrect," so I'll let my posts speak for themselves. Not much to accomplish here.
     
    joe brown, Glass City Cobra and mcvey like this.
  7. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    On a side note I think anyone reading this post needs to just look at how disappointing the classic section is. Posters in here are so biased that they actually believe that super heavyweights never punched with correct technique until the 1980s-1990s even against fight footage. All just to keep up with their twisted arguments.
     
  8. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Nearly every fighter throws their shots different to the next man, are you for real?
     
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Did Ray Arcel ever talk about having to evolve his training methods with the times?
    Did he coach Larry Holmes with revolutionary knowledge he hadn't possessed when he trained B. Baer?

    Did Arcel look like someone frantically trying to keep up with the evolution in the sport? Or did he lament about the inability of contemporary fighters to live up to the legends of old?
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,119
    Jun 2, 2006
    Did guys like Bob Foster,and Jesse Burnett throw the jab the same way as say Holmes ? Nope ,it came up from the waist, Ali often jabbed on the run and from the side,Foreman jabbed through his opponent and said he deliberately discarded that to throw soft jabs at Moorer to set him up for the follow up.There are plenty of variations of the jab and other punches.
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    hang on, you've argued many times that today they have technique today over past ones.

    So, why are you being facetious towards Dag?

    You've argued it a million times!
     
    Mr.DagoWop likes this.
  12. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Yet here we are with no examples...

    Are you trying to tell me that there is a fighter who uses correct technique that doesn't start the punch from the pivot/hip rotation, snap the shoulder, then extend the arm?

    What you have been suggesting is there is no such thing as boxing technique. You should have voted "they always have" instead of the 1980s-1990s. You just exposed yourself as a liar.
     
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    The argument of most people in here is "there is no such thing as technique". If you actually think that then you are a ****ing ****** and should be banned.
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Is your first sentence missing a word? In any event, I have no idea what that has to do with the discussion in this thread. I asked him to clarify what "correct technique" meant to him. I took no substantive position on technique (or techniques) whatsoever.
     
  15. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,377
    26,627
    Jun 26, 2009
    There is such thing as technique, as I've made clear in my many posts. There are multiple, different techniques.

    For the fourth time: Does Muhammad Ali throw the jab the same when moving laterally and throwing it from the side as George Foreman does when stepping forward?

    If by "the same" you mean they both extend their left arm to hit the target, your definition of "correct" is so wide as to be meaningless.

    I know plenty about boxing. So do others. To suggest that anyone who disagrees with you should be banned and doesn't know anything about the sport is utterly ridiculous.
     
    GALVATRON and mcvey like this.