At what weight do you not consider boxers to be small men anymore?

I would have to say 140!

 

It all depends on who you're asking. Remember, size is relative.

 

At around 154.

 

Ww

 

Cruiser.

But then I'm 6'6".

 

Well,I've seen a lot of boxers in person here in Vegas and I have to say small is sure relative. For example, I'm 5'8'' and about 130 lbs. Floyd looks no bigger than me in person, and I would definitely say he is smallish. Winky Wright had toothpick legs, and even though his upper body is broad he still isn't that big. Derrick Harmon, on the other hand, is freaking huge. That guy is tall and thick, I have no idea how he was making super middle or light heavy or whatever it was he was fighting at, because he walks around at well over 210. I guess 154, most welterweights don't look much bigger than me, and I am a small man.

 

It all depends , I have been up close to a British superfeather champ who was 5 9 and probably 165 , but I have also met a supermiddle of the same height , who looked broader , but not that significant , I think its like any sport , men hold weight in different ways.

 

As a rule the lower the weight the more active (and exciting) the fight IMO. Bantamweight and lower has produced many a great fight!

 

i have 126 and below small, 130-147 median and above welterweight big people.

 

160 for me also. I'm 6'3 so...

 

i would say 154 down...at 160 u have guys that can walk around 190 lbs and still make the weight...190lb man is not huge but still a big man..KP has awesome size for 160

 

Anyone below average height which is about 5ft9..guys who are 5ft8 I would see as short although I would never tell them this due to their rage issues

Anyone else find LOTS of people LIE about their height???

Im 6ft2 1/2 for sure ... measured by my dr for medical etc and plenty of men quite a bit shorter than me have told me they are like 6ft2/3/4

 

154