At what weight PAC and Mosley should fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jul 18, 2009.


  1. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    Mosley said he can fight PAC at 140 to challenge for his 140 titles... All PAC has to do is accept Mosley's challenge and we have a fight at 140...;)

    But I think PAC is not like some other boxer who wants to have all the advantages in a fight... I think PAC will just dictate a fight with Mosley at 143 instead of taking advantage of Mosley's willingness to get raped at 140...
    .
     
  2. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009

    What the hell are you talking about Pac's title's , the IBO Jr Welterweight Title , are you nuts , i know he holds the Ring Magazine Jr WW title also but your talking about a man who has held the LW , WW and Jr MW linear title's and is the current WBA WW champion !!!!!! :patsch

    And Pacquiao does what ever Freddy Roach tells him , Roach dictates what weight and who Pacquiao fights and does a grand job at doing so , because the elite fighters are all queing up to fight him as any fight featuring Manny Pacquiao these days is a huge pay day !!!!!!!!
     
  3. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    Thanks for not answering my question.
     
  4. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    What you said is irrelevant... PAC has 4 lineal titles and you're bragging about Mosley's how many linear titles?

    If PAC accepts Mosley's challenge at 140, what are you going to do? Cry? :lol:
    .
     
  5. swilson120

    swilson120 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,009
    0
    May 6, 2009
    play with the big boys or go back down in weight and stop crying about being too small for gods sake
     
  6. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    The answer for that will be quite long... Maybe you can try answering my questions since it's just very simple questions...
    .
     
  7. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    So then why do you cry about the Mayweather-JMM catchweight?

    :patsch
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    You're answer wouldn't be long.

    How does weighing in at 140 even the playing field?
     
  9. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    Did I ?? :lol: Actually I'm laughing at that PBF-JMM mismatch joke fight...
    .
     
  10. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    143 is the even playing field... 140 is PAC's territory, PAC is favored there...
    .
     
  11. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    how does weighing at 143 even the playing field?
     
  12. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009

    No quite the opposite i will laugh at how pathetic Freddy Roach and Manny Pacquiao have become with all this talk of catch weights and so on , then i will sit back and watch with fingers crossed that a De La Hoya doesnt happen to Mosley at clearly the wrong weight class at clearly the wrong time in his career !!!!!!
     
  13. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009

    Added to that i was actually trying to explain just where the IBO Jr WW title would sit in Mosley's trophy cabinet , answer pretty low !!!!!!!! , this was in reference to you saying that Pac's 140lb titles would be on the line if the fight does actually take place @140 therefore what am i making such a fuss about ...........................
     
  14. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    6,107
    0
    Oct 4, 2008

    So what do you prefer? At 140/jr. welter or at a catchweight of 143?
    .
     
  15. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    fixed :lol: